Genetic studies on Bulgarians

Y DNA

Bulgarians, as some of their neighbours show the highest diversity of haplogroups in Europe, marked by significant (> 10%) frequencies of 5 major haplogroups (compared to Atlantic Europe, dominated by > 50% R1b). Most Bulgarians belong to three unrelated haplogroups, 20% of whom to I-M423 (I2a1b), 18% to E-V13 (E1b1b1a1b1a) and 18% to R-M17 (R1a1a), but the biggest part belongs to macro-haplgoroup R (~28%). The major haplogroups, groupped by age of around 20 kya, are:

The overall profile of 808 Bulgarian samples, according to a level of phylogenetic analysis calculating distribution of hgs R1a1a7, R1а1, R1b1a2, R2a, I, E1b1, E1b1b1, E1b1b1a, E1b1b1b, J2b, J2a, J2a1b, J1, G, T, NO, C, H, Q, L, A and B, is positioned nearest to the Romanians per 147 their samples, also backed by studies as early as 2000. However the analysis of the Bulgarian study showed inaccuracy in some aspects using population datasets which proved to contain genetic drift according to alternative more extensive studies on these populations. Furthermore, the analysis did not even involve the populations Macedonians, Serbians, Montenegrins and Slovaks. It is unclear why the extensive datasets and the most proximal Slavic populations to the Bulgarians were excluded from the phylogenetic analysis of the Bulgarian study selectively. The study of the 149 Romanians by whose data they came out most proximal to Bulgarians concludes that Romanians are closer to Ukrainians and Hungarians than to the Bulgarian group sampled by the study. Bulgarians are situated nearer to populations such as Berbers and Sudanese than to Turks and Poles, because all subclades of J and E-M78 are counted together. This situation would not be the same if the analysis calculates distance by considering more recent subclades, e.g. J2 and J1 instead of J, or EV13 instead of EM78, similarly Y-DNA analyses of distribution of haplogroups of pre-Mesolithic age determine Norwegians and Sardinians more proximal to Bulgarians than Poles and Russians. Some central Europeans are situated very distant per data of the phylogenetic Bulgarian study because of scarce datasets containing remarkable genetic drift. For most compared European peoples datasets were taken from Battaglia (2008) which does not involve more than 100 samples per population. The largest-scale study of the Hungarians (n=230) determined that the remaining Finno-Urgic peoples are genetically their furthest populations, and clearly confirmed that the closest Europeans to the Hungarians are the Bulgarians, however the same study determines the Yugoslavs as the nearest population to Bulgarians. Similarly, despite linguistic influence, the contribution of Uralics to the modern Hungarian genetic pool is weak as the contribution of Bulgars to the modern Bulgarian genetic pool is hardly recognisable. According to DNA data for 17 Y-chromosomal STR loci in Macedonians, the Macedonian population has the lowest genetic distance against the Bulgarian population (0.0815). Other Y-DNA studies considered the Bulgarians closest either to Macedonians, Serbs, Bulgarian Turks or Gagauzes, followed either by some of these or by Romanians, or Bosniaks.

A phylogenetic analysis determines that the population of Haskovo Province has shorter genetic distance against the population of the Czech Republic than to the Bulgarian provinces, and that only the population of Burgas Province is closer to Haskovo than the Hungarian population, furthermore only datasets of two more Balkan or Slavic foreign populations(Greece and Croatia) are used and all other Slavic populations are excluded from this analysis.

According to an older study of 127 Bulgarian males, frequencies are the following: 30% R (17% R1a, 11% R1b, 2% R*); 27.5% I; 20% E; 18% J; 1.5% G; 1.5% H; 1% T.

According to another study involving 126 Bulgarian males, frequencies are the following: 30% I (25.5% I2a, 4% I1); 20,5% E; 17.5% R (R1b 11%, R1a 6%); 17.5% J (16% J2); 5.5% G; 4% Q; 1% L; 1% T; unknown 3%.

According to another study involving 100 Bulgarian males, frequencies are the following: 34% I (29% I2a, 3% I1); 30% R (16% R1a, 14% R1b); 21% E (20% E1b1b1a); 9% J; 2% G; 2% T; 1% N.

According to 250 Bulgarian samples from FTDNA, frequencies are the following: 27% I (20% I2a1, 4% I1, 2% I2a2, 1% I2c), 25% E (23% E1b1b1a1, 2% E1b1b1b2a), 23% R (13% R1a, 10% R1b), 17% J (8% J2a, 7% J2b, 2% J1), 6% G2a, 1% H1a, 1% T

mtDNA

Complimentary evidence exists from mtDNA data. Bulgaria shows a very similar profile to other European countries – dominated by mitochondrial haplogroups Hg H (~42%), Hg U (~18%), Hg J/Hg T (~18%), and Hg K (~6%). Like most Europeans, H1 is the prevailing subclade among Bulgarians. Most of the U-carriers belong to U5 and U4. The distribution of the subclades of Haplogroup H have not been revealed. Recent studies show greater diversity within mt Haplogroups than once thought, as sub-haplogroups are being discovered, and often separate migrations and distributions of the Y-DNA haplogroups. While the Y-DNA variation in Europe is clinal, the mitochondrial is not.

The results of the mitochondrial analyses find the Bulgarians more related to North Slavs. The general mtDNA analyses of the study find the Bulgarians in a cluster with Central Europeans, but others find them more related to Balkan peoples, or to both at the same time. According to the largest-scale mtDNA Bulgarian study involving 996 Bulgarian samples, comparing distribution of hgs H, H5, HV, HV0, R0a, J, U1, U2, U2e, U3, U4, U5a, U5b, U6, U7, U8, K, N1, N2, X, M, Т1, Т2, the Bulgarians came out nearest to the Poles, followed by Ukrainians, Croats, Czechs, while neighbouring Turks, Romanians and Greeks remained more or very distant. Several other pan-European analyses of the same Bulgarian samples indicate that the neighbouring populations except the Macedonians are distant from the Bulgarians. According to these the Bulgarians are at minimal distance by mtDNA either to Hungarians, Székelys, Slovaks or to Macedonians, followed either by Ukrainians, Croats or Czechs, while neighbouring populations such as Turks, Romanians, Serbs and Greeks remain more distanced. Italians also remain related according to these studies. According to another analysis, Bulgarians despite being part of a Slavic mitochondrial cluster, are most related to Romanians, followed by Hungarians and Czechs, but distant to Balkan Albanians and Bosniaks, it was also found out that Bulgarians are very distant to all Asian and African populations, but are least distanced by mtDNA to the Arkhangelsk Oblast in Russia where also Y-DNA hg I2 prevails. A more recent pan-Slavic mtDNA plot analyzing genetic distance, situates Bulgarians as sharing their position with Czechs, Romanians, Macedonians and Hungarians, while other close groups to them are Slovaks, Estonians and Latvians. Others determined Albanians and Portuguese as most related to Bulgarians, others determined northern Europeans and Slavs, others Israeli however some of these analyses depend on minimal variance that changes the proximal distance. Other studies consider the Bulgarians closest to Romanians, followed by Italians and Iberians, while Poles, Slovaks, and Czechs are determined more distanced. According to other studies Romanians are the closest, followed by Hungarians, Greeks, Macedonians and then by Central Europeans. It should be noted none of the analyses on genetic distance compares the subclades of Haplogroup H except for H5 due to lacking data, however the structure of the haplogroup of some central European, Balkan and other peoples may be similar to the Bulgarian, at least by division of older subclades of haplogroup H.

MtDNA haplgroups of ~1000 Bulgarians:

Whilst haploid markers such as mtDNA and Y-DNA can provide clues about past population history, they only represent a single genetic locus, compared to hundreds of thousands present in nuclear, autosomes. Although autosomal analyses often sample a small number of Bulgarians, by multiple autosomes multiple ancestral lines may be traced by an individual's 21 autosomes as opposed to one identical mtDNA or Y DNA sex chromosome, whose inheritance although clinal, demonstrates genetic drift often in statistics. Analyses of autosomal DNA markers gives the best approximation of overall 'relatedness' between populations, presenting a less skewed genetic picture compared to Y DNA haplogroups. This atDNA data shows that there are no sharp discontinuities or clusters within the European population. Rather there exists a genetic gradient, running mostly in a southeast to northwest direction. A study compared all Slavic nations and combined all lines of evidence, autosomal, maternal and paternal, including more than 6000 people for and at least 700 Bulgarians from previous studies, of which 13 were used for autosomal analysis (right image). The overall data situates the southeastern group (Bulgarians and Macedonians) in a cluster with Romanians, and they are at similar proximity to Gagauzes, Montenegrins and Serbs who are not part of another cluster but are described as 'in between' clusters. Macedonians and Romanians consistingly keep being among most related to Bulgarians by au, mt, and Y-DNA a conclusion backed also by a pan-European autosomal study investigating 500,568 SNP (loci) of 1,387 Europeans and including 1 or 2 Bulgarians, other more or less extensive data sets situate Bulgarians and Romanians as their nearest . Per HLA-DRB1 allele frequencies Bulgarians are also in a cluster with the same populations. The Balto-Slavic study itself calculated genetic distance by SNP data of the multiple autosomes and ranked most proximal to Bulgarians the Serbs, followed by Macedonians, Montenegrins, Romanians, Gagauzes, Macedonian Greeks apart from Thessaloniki, the rest of the South Slavs, Hungarians, Slovaks, Czechs, and then by Greeks from Thessaloniki, Central Greece and Peloponese. The East Slavs and Poles cluster together remaining less proximal to Bulgarians than Germans, among whom Slav admixture is also observed. Balts, however, according to the PCA analysis are less proximal to Bulgarians than Italians for example are. Bulgarians are also only modestly close to their eastern neighbours – the Anatolian Turks, suggesting the presence of certain geographic and cultural barriers between them. Despite various invasions of Altaic-speaking peoples in Europe, no significant impact from such Asian descent is recorded throughout southern and central Europe.

The study claims that the major part of the Balto-Slavic genetic variation can be primarily attributed to the assimilation of the pre-existing regional genetic components, which differed for present West, East and South Slavic-speaking people. For Slavic peoples correlations with linguistics came out much lower than high correlations with geography. The South Slavic group, despite sharing a common language, is separated and has largely different genetic past from their northern linguistic relatives genetically. Therefore, for the Bulgarians and most other South Slavs the most plausible explanation would be that their most sizable genetic components were inherited from indigenous Balkan pre-Slavic and pre-Bulgar population. Another pan-Slavic Y-DNA study concludes that most of the Southern Slavic group is distinct from their Northern Slavic relatives, whose homogeneity on the other hand stretches form the Alps to Volga end even as far as the Pacific Ocean in Russia. This means that there is a paternal genetic rather than a geographical factor separating these Slavic peoples. The South Slavs are characterized by featuring NRY hgs I2a and E plus 10% higher Mediterranean k2 autosomal component, while the Eastern and Western Slavs are characterized by the k3 component and hg R1a. The current differentiation of high I-P37 and lower R-Z282 among South Slavs and vice versa among North Slavs suggests it was present prior to the Slavic settling in the Balkans as no relevant migrations occur later to change the frequencies. The contribution of the Y chromosomes of peoples who had settled in the Balkans before the Slavic expansion is the most likely explanation of the phenomenon according to the other study on Y-haplotypes, concluded by its two separate analyses because of the complicity of the methods tracing the alleles. The presence of two distinct genetic substrata in the genes of East-West and South Slavs would conclude that assimilation of indigenous populations by bearers of Slavic languages was a major mechanism of the spread of Slavic languages to the Balkan Peninsula.

Southeastern Europeans share large numbers of common ancestors that date roughly to the times of the Slavic expansion around 1,500 years ago. The eastern European populations with high rates of (IBD) are highly coincident with the modern distribution of Slavic languages including Hungary, Romania, Greece and Albania, so it is speculated for Slavic expansion, anyway it was concluded that additional work and methods would be needed to verify this hypothesis. This study detects a considerable connection between Bulgarians and North Slavs that is the result of migrations no earlier than 1500 years ago. A study on genetic admixture filtered to 474,491 autosomal SNPs and including 18 Bulgarians concluded that there is a recent excess of identical by descent sharing in Eastern Europe, and recent period of exchanged segments speculating that this may correspond to the Slavic expansion across this region. A signal at a low frequency among Balkan Slavs was detected that may have been inherited from the medieval Slavic settlers, but it was confirmed that this issue requires further investigation. The short genetic distance of South Slavs does not extend to populations throughout the whole Balkan Peninsula and they are differentiated from all Greek sub-populations that are not Macedonian Greek. The South Slavs share significantly fewer identical by descent segments for length classes with Greeks than with the group of East-West Slavs. Most of the East-West Slavs share as many such segments with the South Slavs as they share with the inter-Slavic populations between them. This might suggest Slavic gene flow across the wide area and physical boundaries such as the Carpathian Mountains, including Hungarians, Romanians and Gagauz. Notably, the number of common ancestors within the last 1,000 to 2,000 years is particularly high within eastern and Slavic-speaking Europe. A high number of shared IBD segments among East Europeans that can be dated to around 1,000–2,000 YBP was revealed. The highest percentage of the total number of shared pairwise IBD segments is detected between the group of East-West Slavs and South Slavs (41% from the total number of IBD segments detected); Baltic speakers, Estonians (40%) and "inter-Slavic" Hungarians, Romanians and Gagauz (37%). East-West Slavs share these segments with Western Europeans (32%), Volga region populations (30) and North Caucasus (21%). South Slavs also share 41% with East-West Slavs and 37% with Inter-Slavic populations, they also share 31% with Western Europeans and 30% with Greeks. However, per one pair of individuals East-West Slavs share more IBD with Balts than with South Slavs, but not with the rest and the same amount with inter-Slavic as with South Slavs. Per one pair of individuals South Slavs keep sharing most IBD with East-South Slavs and the same amount with the inter-Slavic, followed by Greeks and Western Europeans.

For the Bulgarians prevailing donor group in admixture with up to more than 40% are a northeastern group, consistent with the medieval Slav expansion, the date of the admixture event is set at 500-950 CE. The Slavic frequency of the Bulgarians is determined lower than that of Poles and Hungarians, and higher than that of Romanians and Greeks, roughly in between. From data of participating groups, it is inferred that the event of admixture among Bulgarians in the Middle Ages is 46% Belarusian-like, of which most notably Lithuanian-like (23%) and Polish-like (19%), while another 50%+ being Cypriot-like, of which 14% Greek-like. Some of the phenomena that distinguish western and eastern subgroups of the South Slavic people and languages can be explained by two separate migratory streams of different tribal groups of the future South Slavs via both: the west and east of the Carpathian Mountains. By some assumed ancestral populations, about 50% of Bulgarians are in a category "North and East Europe" (right image) similar to the estimate above. It is higher in the West Balkans even among Montenegrins who have only 7% of Haplogroup R1a, which most likely means that the study combines together respective autosomes corresponding to I2a1b and R1a in this category. On the contrary of these estimates is the data for ancestry of 23andme, which separates Northeast European from Southeast European(Balkan) ancestry. In some 23andme examples most South Slavs and Romanians are on average put at over 60% of Balkan source, 10-20% of Northeastern European source, and a further 10% undetermined category "broadly European" that may reduce each frequency. In individuals from all over Romania, who typically plot with Bulgarians and share roughly the same amount of donor groups, Northeast European ancestry may range between several percents and over 45 per sampled individual, while the Balkan is an element with much higher lower and higher bound. The Romanian average per 46 samples of Northeast European ancestry came out 11%, but there is an additional amount of 10% "broadly European", <1% unassigned, which means that Northeast European category may be deflated by a maximum of 10%. Although these estimates are focused on regional sources rather than population sources, none of the two estimates does specifically estimate Slavic or Balto-Slavic admixture or specifies any dates of the regional sources. The Northeastern European percentage from 23andme samples is often by times less than the specified category by DNA.Land "North Slavic". Of the group several sampled Bulgarians by new methodology of DNA.Land the "North Slavic" element averages 25–30%. For comparison, according to the latter data od the "Balkan" element is nonexistent in Belarusians, and most often does not occur in Poles and Ukrainians, but accounts for more than a third of the total in Croats and Bulgarians. Although their data is highly indicative, both 23andme and DNA.Land have some obvious scarce datasets showing most Cypriots as being of Italian ancestry.

The genetic diversity among Bulgarians is the reason of more inherited diseases The blood type of 21,568 Bulgarians is 37% A+ , 28% 0+, 14% B+, 7% AB+, 6+ A-, 4% 0-, 2% B-, 1% AB-, a distribution similar to the Sweden, the Czech Republic and Turkey.

Ancient DNA

Despite the most common haplogroup among Bulgarians is I2a1b at 20%, 8000 years old hunter-gatherer samples of the same haplogroup came out genetically very distant from Bulgarian and Balkan individuals by an autosomal analysis of skeletal remains from Loschbour cave in Luxembourg.

Three out of four samples from Bulgarian Neolithic(6,500-5000 ybp) from Smyadovo came out mtDNA haplogroup H and the other one is T2e, while another 5,500-4,000 old sample from Durankulak is U52a2. Several mtDNA Bulgarian samples considered part of the Yamna culture came out haplogroups H, T2a1b1a, U2e1a, U5a1 and K.

Computing the frequency of common point mutations of several mtDNA Thracian remains from Romania with haplogroups H17, H22 and HV has resulted that the Italian (7.9%), the Albanian (6.3%) and the Greek (5.8%) have shown a bias of closer genetic kinship with the Thracian individuals than the Romanian and Bulgarian individuals (4.2%), but it was noted that more mtDNA sequences from Thracian individuals are needed in order to perform a complex objective statistical analysis. From seven Thracian samples aged about 3 millennia from Gabova Mogila and Shekerdja Mogila in Sliven Province, and from Bereketska Mogila in Stara Zagora Province, two were identified as belonging to mtDNA Haplogroup D, presumably associated with East Asia. Haplogroup W5a was found among two individuals and H1an2. H14b1 was also found. Four samples from Iron Age Bulgaria were studied, the official study confirmed only that the two are male and mtDNA of two individuals - U3b for the Svilengrad man and HV for the Stambolovo individual. Haplogroups U for the Krushare man, U2e for the Vratitsa individual have been identified. Those individuals were from Thracian burial sites and are dated at around 450-1500 BC. Unofficial analysis of the raw data claims that the first one is positive for Y-DNA Haplogroup E-Z1919 or H-Z14031 (H1b1). It also claims that according to the SNPs all the four samples came out male and also in the man from Krushare Haplogroup J-PF5197 (J2a1a1a1b2) was found, while another man's haplogroup came out negative for E, I and J and remained unknown but is likely R1. According to an autosomal analysis of DNA Land, the Svilengrad man came out 100% Mediterranean islander, while the Stambolovo man appears to be 99% Balkan. One of the surprising results are of 3,500-3,100 years old samples from Vratitsa, which came out 60% Northwest European 24% Southwestern European(22% Sardinian),5% Ashkenazi, 5% Mbuti, 3% Native American, 3% South/Central European, 1% North Slavic, along with a 2,400 years old sample from Krushare that is 32% Southwestern European, 26% Northwestern European, 26% Balkan, 5% Central Indo European, 3% Mbuti, 3% Finnish, 3% North Slavic, 1% Ambiguous, 1% Amazonian, in comparison a sample from Iron Age Montenegro is surprising in the opposite direction and came out 64% North Slav and 50% Yamnaya. For the man from Krushare the authors explicitly stated "However, the DNA damage pattern of this individual does not appear to be typical of ancient samples, indicating a potentially higher level of modern DNA contamination.". While the Svilengrad man still shows the highest proportion of Sardinian ancestry, the Krushare more resembles the hunther-gatherer individuals.

20 samples from medieval Bulgarian sites were alleged as originally Bulgar, but there is no evidence for that. They were from a burial site from the Monastery of Mostich in Preslav, Nozharevo, Tuhovishte and most came out European mtDNA haplogroup H, including H1, H1an2, H1r1, H1t1a1, H2a2a1 H5, H13a2c1, H14b1, HV1, J, J1b1a1, T, T2, U4a2b, U4c1 and U3 with the half belonging to Haplogroup H. It was shown a short genetic distance between these samples and modern Bulgarians.

After at least 20 mediaval(10-14th century) mtDNA samples from Cedynia and Lednica in Poland, possibly Slavic, had been studied, the 855 sampled modern Bulgarians come out overally the closest group to these samples out of 20 other European nations and moreover, they share the highest value of haplotypes with the medieval Polish population more than any other compared nation does. Those medieval haplogroups included H, H1a, K1, K2, X2, X4, HV, J1b, R0a, HV0, H5a1a, N1b, T1a, J1b and W. The samples came out distant from modern Polish population, but nearest to the modern Bulgarian and Czech population. 20 medieval(9-12th century) samples from Slovakian sites Nitra Šindolka and 8 from Čakajovce were compared to modern population and Bulgarians, and Portuguese came out nearest to them by genetic distance, however all these came out distant to modern Slovak population.

Further evidence from ancient DNA, reconsiderations of mutation rates, and collateral evidence from autosomal DNA growth rates suggest that the major period of European population expansion occurred after the Holocene. Thus the current geographic spread and frequency of haplogroups has been continually shaped from the time of Palaeolithic colonization to beyond the Neolithic. This process of genetic shaping continued into recorded history, such as the Slavic migrations.

Recent studies of ancient DNA have revealed that European populations are largely descending from three ancestral groups. The first one are Paleolithic Siberians, the second one are Paleolithic European hunter-gatherers, and the third one are early farmers and later arrivals from the Near East and West Asia. According to this, Bulgarians are predominantly (~ 2/3) descending from early Neolithic farmers spreading the agriculture from Anatolia, and from West Asian Bronze Age invaders and cluster together with other Southern Europeans. Another of the admixture signals in that farmers involves some ancestry related to East Asians, with ~ 2% total Bulgarian ancestry proportion linking to a presence of nomadic groups in Europe, from the time of the Huns to that of the Ottomans. A third signal involves admixture between the North European group from one side and the West Asian - Early farmers' group from another side, at approximately the same time as the East Asian admixture, ca. 850 AD. This event may correspond to the expansion of Slavic language speaking people. The analysis documents the hunter-gatherer admixture in Bulgarians at a level from ca. 1/3. The impact of Yamnaya culture is estimated at 20-30%, which is most common among the Slavs.

According to Genographic Project's autosomal study called Your Regional Ancestry based on nine regional affiliations, the Bulgarians regional ancestry results are as follows: 47% Mediterranean and 20% southwest Asian impact, which reflect the strong influence of neolithic agriculturalists from the Fertile Crescent; 31% Northern European component that reflects Paleolithic hunter-gathers' ancestry; 2% Northeast Asian component which shows there have been some mixings with Asiatic invaders.

Physical features

According to early 20th century statistics on 230,000 Bulgarians, between 9-12% of them were blond-type depending on the region, the brunette type makes up 42-47%, while 43-46% are determined as an intermediate type (light eyes and dark hair or vice versa). The highest proportion of 12% blond type is placed in southwestern Bulgaria, followed by the southern provinces Macedonia, Thrace and least of 9% is in northern Bulgaria. The same and other nationwide studies observe heterogeneity in cephalic index in northern (brachycephalic) and southern (mesocephalic) Bulgaria. Results from a 20th-century study on 9,000 persons of Bulgarian ethnicity at an average age of 22, including about 400 Muslim Bulgarians and 500 from Vardar Macedonia concluded that 13% of the males are blond-haired and light-eyed at the same time by Martin-Saller scale, while 55% of them are brown/black-haired and dark-eyed. Other statistics consider 13% as blue-eyed and 25% as grey-eyed.

A late 20th century anthropological study on over 5,000 adults, involving only participants aged 30–40 and Romani participants, other minorities and dark-skinned people in the common statistics of unknown number, found relatively homogeneous results by regions. It involved also numerous researches. One of them found the skin color "white" to be prevailing among all genders and regions with 80%, but some 20% were determined as mat and light mat skinned. Consistency of more frequent natural light hair was found among women, and slightly more frequent light eyes among men. A hair color "brown-black" (80% of men, 67% women) was found prevailing among all genders and regions. By Fischer-Saller scale 3% of the men were determined blond, mostly dark blonde, and 18% brown-haired. 7% of the sampled women were determined as naturally blonde and 26% as brown-haired. Most frequent naturally blonde women were found in Sofia-city, namely 12% of the women there, of which 5% were light-blonde. Reddish-haired men and women make up 0.1 and 0.2%, peaking at almost a percent in the former Haskovo and Burgas provinces. Eye color by Martin distribution found most often prevailing "dark, black-brown and brown" color (48% men, 57% women). In some regions "motley color - green-brown, gray-brown, blue-brown" color (45% men, 38% women) was found leading, peaking among Lovech men at 50%. The gray and blue eyes were detected at 6% among the women and 8% among the men. Most of the women have moderately prominent cheekbones (60%) and sometimes strongly (14%), men have the same characteristics at frequencies 40% and 3%. 77 and 65 kg is the mean weight of men and women and the BMI - 26. 45 is the mean hand strength. The hell/dark dental colour of women and men is 21%/16% and 49%/2% respectively, the rest being a middle color. Straight nose occurs at 70% of both genders, convex nose at 28%/21% of men/women and concave nose at 3%/8%, while only in Haskovo the concave nose among women (11%) outnumbers the convex (10%). Without a change of more than a centimeter for the past century, 171/159 cm was the average male/female height and 173/161 cm in Sofia. 52% of the men recorded were between 170–178 cm and 8% taller than this, while the highest of all was 191 cm. 41% of the recorded women were 159–168 cm and 6% - taller than this.

More recently it was estimated that 175/163 cm is the average male/female height and 178/164 cm in Sofia.