Levy Konigsberg

History

Levy Konigsberg, formerly known as Levy Phillips & Konigsberg, was founded in 1985 by Stanley J. Levy, Steven J. Phillips, and Alan J. Konigsberg. All three attorneys were previously partners at Kreindler & Kreindler. After Mr. Phillips left the firm in 2012 to pursue different areas of specialty, the firm was renamed Levy Konigsberg.

The firm was recognized as one of the 50 Law Firms in the 2015 Elite Trial Lawyers list by The National Law Journal.

Asbestos litigation

The firm's asbestos litigation involvement traces back to Levy's role in the litigation during the 1980s and early 1990s. Levy was one of the attorneys, cited by the New York Times, as representing workers at the Electric Boat shipyard in Groton, Connecticut in cases brought to trial beginning in 1982. In 1986, when Johns-Manville was completing its bankruptcy reorganization, Levy, who was head of the committee representing asbestos victims, was chosen to serve on the Board of Directors for the company while it emerged from bankruptcy.

In 1990, the firm and Levy participated in a large trial in federal court before Judge Jack Weinstein in Brooklyn involving more than 500 plaintiffs who claimed injury from asbestos exposure from working at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. According to a news article covering the Brooklyn Navy Yard trial, Levy Phillips & Konigsberg represented 132 of the plaintiffs and was then representing “more than 500 asbestos cases elsewhere”.

The firm's involvement in asbestos litigation continued into the 2000s. In one series of cases, the firm represented clients against a miner of asbestos-contaminated talc located in St. Lawrence County, New York including a case in which a man developed mesothelioma from using the talc in creating pottery and another case in which a man developed the same asbestos-related cancer from using the talc in making ceramics. In a case against a different talc company, the firm was involved in another landmark talc case against a manufacturer for selling talc that was contaminated with asbestos. The firm secured a jury verdict for a man who developed mesothelioma from working in a factory that manufactured cosmetic talc products between 1967 and 1975.

The firm has also litigated asbestos cases against manufacturers and suppliers of asbestos-containing automotive products. In 2008, the firm obtained a $30.3 million jury verdict in Bergen County, New Jersey in a case in which a man died from mesothelioma at the age of 50. The man was exposed to asbestos from working a few summers at a General Motors auto parts warehouse. There was also $7.7 million for a family of a deceased school bus driver. The settlement was the largest of its kind to date in the Syracuse area of New York. The driver had been exposed to asbestos-laden brakes, gaskets, and clutches in the buses he had driven over a forty-year period. A similar case was brought against the Ford Motor Company by Levy Konigsberg when a man complained of asbestos related issues, after he worked on automotive parts between the 1960s to the 1980s bearing the Ford name.

In 2009, the burial of Harold St. John who developed mesothelioma was delayed after he died a couple of days before his trial was about to start. The St. John case picked up media coverage as the family was temporarily prevented by court order from performing the burial as the result of efforts by companies (including Chrysler) that contended that an autopsy would aid their defense. The family had refused the autopsy on religious and moral grounds. Levy Konigsberg was able to obtain a court order permitting the burial of Mr. St. John before the trial started without the need for an autopsy. After the ruling permitting St. John’s burial, a spokesperson for Chrysler, stated: “At no time did Chrysler intend any disrespect to the late Mr. St. John or to his family at this difficult time.” Moshe Maimon, partner with Levy Konigsberg, stated: “We are relieved that Harry St. John can finally rest in peace”.

Levy Konigsberg handled a case of first impression in New Jersey involving a woman’s exposure to asbestos from laundering her husband’s contaminated work clothes worn home from an Exxon Mobil plant. The case was concluded in 2011 when the New Jersey Supreme Court subsequently declined to hear the case thereby upholding the jury verdict in favor of the woman. The firm has also represented construction workers who helped construct some of the largest buildings and power plants in New York. This included a $7 million award in 2014 for a Long Island, New York man who participated in the construction of the Northport Power Station.

In an unusual case involving a truck driver who developed mesothelioma, Levy Konigsberg won a $7.3 million jury verdict in New York City in 2014 against Union Carbide. The man was exposed to asbestos from Union Carbide’s asbestos-containing material that he picked up in bags from the company’s plant in Bound Brook, New Jersey.

In 2013, the Wall Street Journal reported that the law firm had made donations to the medical community for mesothelioma research. Dr. Harvey Pass stated during an interview that he often recommended Levy Konigsberg and several other firms to sufferers. According to the article, Jerome H. Block, a partner at Levy Konigsberg stated, "the firm donates money without any promise of referrals. But he doesn't see anything wrong with doctors recommending attorneys with good reputations".

In a landmark case in 2014, Levy Konigsberg won a $90.5 million court judgment. Judge Ana Viscomi rendered the verdict after hearing evidence on the issue of damages arising from 11 people who died from mesothelioma in connection with the Johns-Manville plant located in Manville, New Jersey. The judgment was entered against two Swiss companies (Anova Holding AG and Becon AG) who supplied asbestos to the Manville plant but failed to participate in the legal proceeding brought against them in New Jersey.

In April 2015, Robert Komitor, a partner at Levy Konigsberg, spoke on behalf of a number of plaintiffs at a town hall meeting before Judge Peter Moulton, who presides over the New York City Asbestos Litigation. The New York Post reported on the meeting, which took place amid the public corruption case against Sheldon Silver, and quoted Komitor as stating “that he would oppose any reforms that could slow down the litigation process and put clients that are fatally ill at risk of dying before trial.”

Qui Tam

Levy Konigsberg is active in Qui Tam cases also known as Whistleblower of False Claims Act cases. In one case filed in 2009, the firm represented a whistleblower, Dr. Gabriel Feldman, who uncovered a large-scale Medicaid fraud. Founding partner Alan J. Konigsberg represented Feldman in the case that resulted in a $70 million settlement paid to the U.S. Government by the New York City government. Feldman was awarded $14.7 million for his role in exposing the fraud. According to a New York Times article discussing the case, Dr. Feldman contended in the lawsuit that “the city was giving people services that squandered taxpayer money”. The case concluded years of work by Dr. Feldman when he “began reviewing Medicaid cases in New York in 1990, and first tried to blow the whistle on the city’s program in 1993 when he testified before the City Council.” The $70 million settlement is one of the largest awards in whistleblower cases that New York City has ever paid.

Lead poisoning

Another practice area for Levy Konigsberg is representing children that have suffered lead poisoning, most often occurring from lead paint used in residences. In one case, a young boy suffered from lead poisoning in a rented, city-owned apartment in the Bedford-Stuyvesant section of Brooklyn, New York. Levy Konigsberg won the case, receiving a $3.85 million jury verdict. The New York Post reported that the damages for the lead-poisoned child were $850,000 for pain and suffering and $3 million for loss of earning potential.

Levy Konigsberg is representing a large number of children who suffered lead poisoning as the result of exposure to contaminated water in Flint, Michigan. The Detroit News reported that the firm had filed individual personal injury cases on behalf of 949 children as of October 2016. The article discusses the delay that has occurred in the Flint Water Crisis cases while the parties await the Court’s entry of a Case Management Order and a determination of which law firms will take the lead role in the litigation. In the article, Levy Konigsberg attorney Corey Stern stated:“Everyone is sort of forgetting some of the cases are just about kids who are getting left back in school due to learning disabilities… They can’t get proper monitoring because the case is stalled.”

Corey Stern, an attorney with Levy Konigsberg, is serving as “lead counsel” in the Flint Water Crisis litigation and is responsible for “coordinating the prosecution of plaintiffs' claims and coordinating the pretrial proceedings on behalf of all plaintiffs…"

Tobacco litigation

Levy Konigsberg is one of the few firms to have obtained multiple jury verdicts against makers of cigarettes in tobacco litigation. In a case filed in 2005, the firm represented Eileen Clinton in a case involving the lung cancer death of her husband Bill Champagne who began smoking cigarettes when he was 12 years old. In 2012, the case went to trial in federal court in White Plains, New York. The jury returned a verdict in the amount of $1.34 million against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. The same jury rendered a defense verdict in favor of co-defendant Philip Morris USA. At the time of the verdict, Clinton was working for the Medical Society of the State of New York to educate physicians on how to help their patients quit smoking. After the verdict, a spokesperson for the American Lung Association said that the verdict “reinforced once again that Big Tobacco uses its hundreds of millions in profits to target new customers (for products) that will kill them if used as directed.”

In a separate tobacco case tried by Levy Konigsberg in 2013, the firm represented Florence Mulholland whose husband David Mulholland died from lung cancer at the age of 57. Mulholland started smoking at the age of 13, was a pack a day smoker by the age of 15 and died from lung cancer in 2005. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the Mulhollands against Philip Morris USA. The award of $4.93 million was entered by the New York federal judge who denied Philip Morris’ motions to set aside the verdict. Philip Morris then appealed the verdict to the United States District Court for the Second Circuit who upheld the verdict in 2015. In the same ruling, the Court denied Levy Konigsberg’s cross-appeal to send the case back to the trial court for consideration of punitive damages. The Court determined that the Master Settlement Agreement reached between the Tobacco Industry and the Attorney General for the State of New York barred claims in New York courts for punitive damages relating to tobacco industry misconduct.

Childcare abuse

Since 2015, Levy Konigsberg has been involved in a civil lawsuit against a pre-school after evidence showed that some of the children had been abused. Videos of the abuse went viral, showing rough and aggressive handling of children. Following the viral leak, a lawyer from Levy Konigsberg appeared on NBC News. The teacher involved was indicted following the incident.

Repetitive stress injury

In the 1990s, the firm represented a large number of plaintiffs who suffered repetitive strain injury (RSI) allegedly caused, in part, by poorly designed data processing equipment. In one of the earliest RSI case, Apple settled the lawsuit of Nancy Ubanski, a 30-year-old former high school secretary, who suffered disabling injuries to her hands and wrists. The New York Times reported that Apple settled the case after it discovered that its outside litigation firm had failed to disclose relevant documents.

The firm won a verdict of $5.3 million in an RSI case tried in 1996 against Digital Equipment Corporation. However, that verdict was overturned in 1997 by Judge Jack Weinstein. As of 1997, a lawyer representing I.B.M. stated that 13 out of 14 RSI cases that had been decided by juries had been decided in favor of the defendants. This trend of defense verdicts in the RSI cases continued in June 1998 when a federal jury in Brooklyn rejected the claims of nine people who suffered injuries from using computer keyboards.