Siddhesh Joshi (Editor)

To Be and to Have

Updated on
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Covid-19
8/101 Votes Alchetron
8
1 Ratings
100
90
81
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Rate This

Rate This

Director  Nicolas Philibert
Music director  Philippe Hersant
Country  France
8/10 IMDb

Genre  Documentary, Family
Duration  
Language  French
To Be and to Have movie poster
Release date  19 May 2002
Initial DVD release  September 4, 2002 (France)
Cast  Olivier (Olivier), Guillaume (Guillaume), Johan (Jojo), Jonathan (Jonathan), Laura (Laura), Létitia (Laeticia)
Similar movies  Ratatouille, Boyhood, The Hours, Nanny McPhee, The Wave, The Awakening
Tagline  An observation of the humanity of young people.

Etre et avoir to be and to have 2002


To Be and To Have (French: Être et avoir; also the UK title) is a 2002 French documentary film directed by Nicolas Philibert about a small rural school. It was screened as an "Out of Competition" film at the 2002 Cannes Film Festival and achieved commercial success. The film became the subject of an unsuccessful legal action by the school's teacher, who said that he and the children's parents had been misled about the film's intended audience, and that he and the children had been exploited.

Contents

To Be and to Have movie scenes

The documentary's title translates as "to be and to have", the two auxiliary verbs in the French language. It is about a primary school in the commune of Saint-Étienne-sur-Usson, Puy-de-Dôme, France, the population of which is just over 200. The school has one small class of mixed ages (from four to twelve years), with a dedicated teacher, Mr Lopez, who shows patience and respect for the children as we follow their story through a single school year.

To Be and to Have movie scenes

The film won several awards, including the 2003 Sacramento French Film Festival Audience Prize.

To Be and to Have movie scenes

Etre et avoir to be and to have 2002


Critical response

To Be and to Have wwwgstaticcomtvthumbdvdboxart31447p31447d

On Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 97%, based on 59 reviews, with an average rating of 8.1/10. The site's critical consensus reads, "A small, sensitive, and moving portrait of a teacher and his students." On Metacritic the film has a score of 87 out of 100, based on 26 critics, indicating "universal acclaim".

Lawsuit

Following the film's popularity in cinemas, Lopez, the principal personality in the documentary, made an unsuccessful attempt to sue the documentary's makers for a share of the €2 million profit. One of his main claims was that the film-makers had exploited his image without authorisation. French film unions warned that if Lopez had been successful it would have spelt "the death of the documentary, undermining the crucial principle that subjects should not be paid to participate".

Speaking after the court case, Lopez said that he, the children and their families had been misled by the film's production company about the purpose and intended audience of the film:

"We were misled. The production company told me and the children's families that they were making a small documentary about the phenomenon of the one-teacher village school and that the film would be used primarily for educational purposes. They said it would have a restricted screening, and never discussed marketing the film to make it such a commercial venture....We had no idea that it would be in cinemas all over the country, released on DVD or distributed abroad.

The court ruled that Lopez's attendance at the Cannes film festival, which he attended with some of the students,and his repeated public expressions of satisfaction at its success, constituted his tacit acceptance of the use of his image.

The French media had been critical of Lopez, with one newspaper carrying the headline: "To be and to have: the teacher would rather have." However Lopez said money was never his motivation: "I'm simply trying to make the film company recognise my rights." Lopez was supported in his action by the families of most of his former pupils, some of whom stated that they themselves would also sue the film company.

Lopez said the unexpected attention the film had brought the young students had traumatised some of them:

"One child, who had been very stable and happy until the film's release, was so distressed by his unexpected fame, that he started wetting the bed, and became afraid of the dark...Other children have been teased at their new secondary schools because of their involvement. All have been subjected to a great deal of stress as a direct consequence of the film."

References

To Be and to Have Wikipedia
To Be and to Have IMDb To Be and to Have themoviedb.org


Similar Topics
Nanny McPhee
Ratatouille
Bouncing Babies
Topics
 
B
i
Link
H2
L