Dissent Thomas | End date 1999 | |
Full case name State of Minnesota et al. v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians et al. Citations 526 U.S. 172 (more)
526 U.S. 172, 119 S.Ct. 1187, 143 L.Ed.2d 270, 67 USLW 4189, 29 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,557, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2104, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2735, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 162 Prior history 861 F. Supp. 784 (D. Minn. 1994), aff'd, 124 F.3d 904 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. granted, 524 U.S. 915 (1998). Majority O'Connor, joined by Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer Dissent Rehnquist, joined by Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas Ruling court Supreme Court of the United States Similar United States v Washington, Johnson v M'Intosh, Cherokee Nation v Georgia, Worcester v Georgia | ||
Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians, 526 U.S. 172 (1999), was a United States Supreme Court decision concerning the usufructuary rights of the Ojibwe (Chippewa) tribe to certain lands it had ceded to the federal government in 1837. The Court ruled that the Ojibwe retained certain hunting, fishing, and gathering rights on the ceded land.
Contents
Background
Under the authority of the Treaty of St. Peters of 1837 (7 Stat. 536), also known as the "White Pine Treaty," the Ojibwe (Chippewa) Nations ceded a vast tract of lands stretching from what now is north-central Wisconsin to east-central Minnesota. Article 5 of the treaty states, "The privilege of hunting, fishing, and gathering the wild rice, upon the lands, the rivers and the lakes included in the territory ceded, is guaranteed to the Indians, during the pleasure of the President of the United States."
The states of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin were later formed from various ceded territories, including the large tract from the White Pine Treaty. The government officials of these states asserted authority over hunting and fishing rights without regard for the treaty rights reserved by the Ojibwe.
From the 1960s to the 1990s, various bands of Ojibwe attempted to reassert their fishing rights on the Great Lakes. Those who did so were commonly arrested or harassed. This led to a series of lawsuits and protracted legal battles in each of the three states. The conflict culminated in the U.S. Supreme Court decision Minnesota v. Mille Lacs (1999).
Decision
The Court affirmed the rights of the Ojibwe to hunt, fish, and gather on the lands ceded by treaty, contingent upon a set of guidelines to protect the Great Lakes fisheries. This decision is an important victory for proponents of Native American sovereignty.