Trisha Shetty (Editor)

Mills v United Building Soc

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
30 September 1988

End date
  
September 30, 1988

Citation(s)
  
[1988] 2 NZLR 392

Mills v United Building Soc

Full case name
  
Jason Charles Mills & Lorraine Marjorie Mills v United Building Society

Transcript(s)
  
Court of Appeal judgment

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of New Zealand

Judge sittings
  
Ivor Richardson, Edward Somers

Mills v United Building Soc [1988] 2 NZLR 392 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding what is "misleading or deceptive" conduct under section 9 of the Fair Trading Act [1986].

Contents

Background

Mills was interested in purchasing a block of units at a mortgagee auction on behalf of United Building Society.

Whilst Mills at the time was aware that it was a leasehold property, when bidding, he valued it on the basis it was a "Glasgow lease", even though the auctioneer had informed it was a "freidlander lease", which is an uncommon type of lease in New Zealand.

After buying the property at the auction, Mills was later told by his valuer that this type of lease was worth far less than if it was a Glasglow lease.

Mills tried to rectify the situation by suing the building society for misleading conduct under the Fair Trading Act.

Held

Mills claim was dismissed

References

Mills v United Building Soc Wikipedia