Introduced on June 28, 2013 U.S.C. section(s) affected 49 U.S.C. ยง 60102(p), | Number of co-sponsors 3 | |
![]() | ||
Full title To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify requirements relating to the availability of pipeline safety regulatory documents, and for other purposes. Sponsored by Rep. Jeff Denham (R, CA-10) |
H
Contents
Background
On January 3, 2012, Congress passed the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 (112-90, H
Provisions/Elements of the bill
H.R. 2576 makes three main changes to the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011. First, it extends the deadline from 1 year to 3 years to give the pipeline industry and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration more time to organize and release these standards in a public manner. Second, it removes the word "guidance" from the law, which would reduce the number of documents that must be available online by limiting the law to requiring only the actual standards. Finally, H.R. 2576 would remove the phrase "on an internet Web site" from the law, which would allow the industry and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration to determine an alternate way to still grant access to the standards documents without forcing them to be freely available on the web.
House
H.R. 2576 was introduced into the House by Rep. Jeff Denham (R-CA) on June 28, 2013. It was referred to the United States House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the United States House Transportation Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials, and the United States House Committee on Energy and Commerce. It was reported by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure on July 16, 2013 alongside House Report 113-152 part 1. The House voted on July 16, 2013 to pass the bill with a vote of 405-2 (Roll Call Vote 354).
Senate
H.R. 2576 was received in the United States Senate on July 17, 2013 and referred to the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Debate and discussion
House Republicans were in favor of the bill. According to their Legislative Digest, the provision, as it stands, "has the potential to infringe upon the intellectual property rights of Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) and would allow overseas competitors free access to intellectual property, which could hurt the income stream of SDOs."