Harman Patil (Editor)

Sirdar v The Army Board

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
26 October 1999

Ruling court
  
European Court of Justice

End date
  
October 26, 1999

Full case name
  
Sirdar v The Army Board & Secretary of State for Defence

Citation(s)
  
(1999) C-273/97, [1999] ECR I-7403

Similar
  
Alpine Investments BV v Mini, Association belge des Consom, Faccini Dori v Recreb Srl, Überseering BV v Nordic C, Etam plc v Rowan

Sirdar v The Army Board (1999) C-273/97 is a UK labour law case concerning genuine occupational requirements for a job.

Contents

Facts

Ms Sirdar was refused a position in the marines, and made redundant from position as chef. In the marines there had to be interoperability, so all marine members had to be capable of combat. There was a ban on combat for women.

Judgment

The ECJ held Member States ‘depending on the circumstances, national authorities have a certain degree of discretion when adopting measures which they consider to be necessary in order to guarantee public security in a Member State’. Because marines were the ‘point of the arrow head’ the competent authorities were justified in having it be exclusively male.

References

Sirdar v The Army Board Wikipedia