Samiksha Jaiswal (Editor)

Etam plc v Rowan

Updated on
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Covid-19
Citation(s)  [1989] IRLR 150
Etam plc v Rowan httpsuploadwikimediaorgwikipediacommonsthu
Court  Employment Appeal Tribunal
Similar  Shamoon v Chief Constabl, Grainger plc v Nicholson, Chief Constable of West Y

Etam plc v Rowan [1989] IRLR 150 is a UK labour law case concerning discrimination, and genuine occupational requirements. It would now fall under the Equality Act 2010 Schedule 9.

Contents

Facts

Mr Rowan applied for a job in Etam plc’s women’s clothing shop. The job involved changing room duties and the employers argued there was a genuine occupational qualification under SDA 1975 section 7(2)(b). He argued that s 7(4) would be triggered, because other women could do the changing room.

The Tribunal found that there was sex discrimination and no genuine occupational qualification.

Judgment

The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that Mr Rowan ‘would have been able to adequately carry out the bulk of the job of sales assistant, and such parts as he could not carry out could easily have been done by other sales assistants without causing any inconvenience or difficulty for the appellants.’

References

Etam plc v Rowan Wikipedia


Similar Topics
Grainger plc v Nicholson
Chamayam (1993 film)
John Bundrick
Topics
 
B
i
Link
H2
L