8.2 /10 1 Votes
Country United States Subject Human nature Pages 288 Genre Science | 4.1/5 Goodreads Language English Publication date 1978 Originally published 1978 Page count 288 Publisher Harvard University Press | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Media type Print (Hardcover and Paperback) Awards Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction Similar E O Wilson books, Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction winners, Sociobiology books | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Steven pinker on human nature
On Human Nature (1978; second edition 2004) is a book by Harvard biologist E. O. Wilson, in which Wilson attempts to explain human nature and society through sociobiology. Wilson argues that evolution has left its traces on characteristics such as generosity, self-sacrifice, worship and the use of sex for pleasure, and proposes a sociobiological explanation of homosexuality. He attempts to complete the Darwinian revolution by bringing biological thought into social sciences and humanities. Wilson describes On Human Nature as a sequel to his earlier books The Insect Societies (1971) and Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (1975).
Contents
Summary
Wilson writes that On Human Nature is the third of a trilogy, the previous volumes of which were The Insect Societies (1971) and Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (1975), and that its thesis is that general sociobiology, "the extension of population biology and evolutionary theory to social organization", is the appropriate means of closing "the famous gap between the two cultures". He proposes that homosexuality may be "a distinctive beneficent behavior that evolved as an important element of early human social organization", describing it as "above all a form of bonding", possibly based on a genetic predisposition.
Reception
On Human Nature won a 1979 Pulitzer Prize. Anthropologist Sarah Blaffer Hrdy wrote that a reading of the book refutes the accusation that Wilson aims to use sociobiology to reinforce traditional sex roles. Philosopher Roger Scruton, writing in Sexual Desire (1986), criticized Wilson's sociobiological explanations of human social behavior, arguing that because of Wilson's "polemical purpose" he was forced to engage in "immense simplification" of the facts. However, he granted that sociobiological explanations of the sort favored by Wilson might possibly be correct. Anthropologist Donald E. Brown, writing in Human Universals (1991), commented that he at first failed to read Wilson's book because his views were still conditioned by the "sociocultural perspectives" in which he had been trained. However, Brown concluded that "sociobiologists might be more convincing if they confined their explanations to universals rather than attempting to show that virtually everything that humans do somehow maximizes their reproductive success." Science writers John Gribbin and Mary Gribbin described On Human Nature as an "accessible account of the application of sociobiology to people".
Sociologist Ullica Segerstråle considered the book essentially a development of Wilson's earlier ideas. Segerstråle commented that, unlike opponents of sociobiology, Wilson saw it as having liberal political implications, and tried to develop these suggestions in On Human Nature. Psychologist David P. Barash and author Ilona A. Barash called On Human Nature, "A wide-ranging, thoughtful, and controversial classic of human sociobiology".
In 2011, On Human Nature was named by Time magazine as one of the "100 best and most influential" books written in English since 1923.