Old Church Slavonic is an inflectional language with moderately complex verbal and nominal systems.
Contents
- Nouns
- Indefinite pronouns and adjectives
- Adjectives
- Adjective gradation
- Comparative
- Superlative
- Present
- Asigmatic aorist
- Sigmatic aorist
- New aorist
- Imperfect
- Present active participle
- Present passive participle
- Past active participle
- l participle
- Past passive participle
- Perfect
- Pluperfect
- Future
- Future perfect
- Conditional
- Primary adverbs
- Pronominal adverbs
- Nominal adverbs
- Primary prepositions
- Secondary prepositions
- Conjunctions and particles
- References
Nouns
The nominal case category distinguishes 7 cases for nouns, 6 for pronouns and adjectives (no vocative):
Indefinite pronouns and adjectives
The interrogative pronouns kъto, čьto can also have the indefinite meanings of 'anybody', 'anything' respectively.
The prefix ně- imparts an indefinite meaning to the word to which it is attached: thus kъto ('who?') becomes někъto ('someone'), and čьto ('what?') becomes něčьto ('something'). Similarly, the prefix ni- imparts a negative meaning: nikъto ('no one'), ničьto ('nothing'). A prepositions may come between prefix and base word:
ně u kogo — with someoneni o komьže nerodiši — you care for no oneAdjectives
OCS adjectives can be in two forms: short and long, corresponding to indefinite and definite meaning respectively. The long form is generally used only attributively, whereas the short form is predicative in nature. So, e.g., člověkъ dobrъ "a good man, man is good" whilst člověkъ dobryi "the good man, the man who is good".
Indefinite adjectives are inflected as the corresponding nouns of the primary declension, e.g., novъ as rabъ, nova as žena, novo as selo, ništь as vračь, ništa as duša, nište as polje.
Definite adjectives (also known as compound, long, or pronominal forms of adjective) are formed by suffixing to the indefinite form the anaphoric third-person pronoun jь (spelled as i in OCS orthography), ja, je as shown in the table.
Adjective gradation
There are three levels of adjective gradation in OCS:
Comparative
- Adjectives with falling tone on the root syllable:
- Adjectives with rising tone on the root syllable:
Superlative
The superlative is formed:
- by adding the prefix nai- to the comparative base: naidražii, naitęžьši, naigrǫble;
- by combining the comparative form with the pronoun vьsego/vьsěxъ: nověi vьsego, dražii vьsěxъ.
The absolute superlative is formed:
- by adding the prefix prě- to the positive: prědragъ, prěnova, prěstaro;
- by using the adverb Ʒělo with the positive: Ʒělo dragъ, Ʒělo nova, Ʒělo staro.
All ordinals are inflected like the corresponding adjectives.
Present
The present tense is formed by adding present-tense endings onto the present tense stem, which itself is sometimes hidden due to sound changes that have occurred in the past (more common verbs are listed):
There are several classes of verbs:
1. e-type verbs add the interfix -e- to the present stem (except in front of -ǫ) and the endings:
2. i-type verbs exhibit the same set of endings, but this time the interfix is -i- (except in front of -ǫ and -ę). In the first person singular one finds the processes of iotation (k/c + j > č, g/z + j > ž, x/s + j > š, l + j > lj, n + j > nj, t + j > št, d + j > žd) and epenthesis (bj > blj, pj > plj, mj > mlj, vj > vlj):
3. The athematic verbs byti, dati, věděti, iměti and jasti form the present tense irregularly:
One should distinguish the verbs iměti (imamь, imaši, imatъ), imati (jemljǫ, jemleši, jemletъ) and jęti (imǫ, imeši, imetъ). Exceptional is also the verb xotěti which exhibits iotation even though it's not an i-type verb (xoštǫ, xošteši, xoštetъ).
Asigmatic aorist
The asigmatic aorist (also called root or simple aorist) was named after the loss of the phoneme /s/ in the inflection (AGr. sigma), i.e. there is no VsV > VxV change (intervocalic /s/ yielding /x/). Over time, the asigmatic aorist became increasingly marked as an archaic language feature and was eventually replaced by the other two aorist formations.
The asigmatic aorist was formed by adding to the infinitive stem of e-type verbs with stem ending in a consonant (i.e. verbs with the infix -nǫ-, which is dropped before the aorist endings, and verbs with the null infix) the following endings: -ъ, -e, -e; -omъ, -ete, -ǫ; -ově, -eta, -ete.
Sigmatic aorist
The sigmatic or s-aorist was formed in the following ways:
New aorist
The new aorist (also known as ox-aorist) is formed by suffixing to the infinitive stem of e-type verbs ending in a consonant (verbs with the interfix -nǫ- and verbs with the null interfix) the interfix -os- (-ox) and onto it the endings -ъ, -, -; -omъ, -te, -ę; -ově, -ta, -te. Intervocalic sigma s changes into x.
The 2nd and the 3rd person singular forms are not attested and thus the asigmatic aorist forms are taken as a replacement.
Imperfect
There are two ways of forming the imperfect:
1. If the infinitive stems ends in -a or -ě, the interfix -ax- is appended (which changes to -aš- according to the first palatalization in front of e) and onto it, the endings of the asigmatic aorist: -ъ, -e, -e; -omъ, -ete, -ǫ; -ově, -eta, -ete.
2. The other way of forming the imperfect, applying to all other verbal stems, is by adding onto the present stem the interfix -ěax- (which, in accordance with the first palatalization, is changed to -ěaš- in front of e) and onto it the endings of asigmatic aorist: -ъ, -e, -e; -omъ, -ete, -ǫ; -ově, -eta, -ete.
Both of these imperfect formations often occur side by side in verbs with stem alternation:
In the texts of the OCS canon the forms are often contracted, so that ěax becomes ěx and aax becomes ax. An illustrating example is in Chernorizets Hrabar's famous work O pismenex "An Account of Letters":
Some forms exhibit sound changes, namely palatalization or iotation in front of ě, yat thus turning into a. The same applies if the stem ends in j which is then reduced in front of yat and yat again changes into a:
That the second form and not the first is the original one (the first being formed by the change of yat to a) is confirmed by the imperfect paradigm of the verb byti:
Present active participle
The present active participle is formed by adding the following endings to the present stem:
1. e-type verbs and athematic verbs:
2. e-type verbs whose present stem ends in a palatal:
3. i-type verbs:
Present passive participle
The present passive participle is formed by suffixing to the present stem the endings -o/e/i + m + ъ/a/o (masculine, feminine, neuter):
1. e-type verbs and athematic verbs:
2. e-type verbs whose stem ends in a palatal:
3. i-type verbs:
Past active participle
The past active participle is formed by suffixing to the infinitive stem the following endings:
1. e-type verbs and athematic verbs:
2. i-type verbs exhibit epenthetic v, which eliminates hiatus:
The latter i-type verbs have twofold forms of this participle - the mentioned one of older origin, and a newer one which arose due to analogical leveling:
3. Verbs with liquid metathesis form this participle from its older stem form:
4. Irregular participles:
l-participle
The l-participle (also known as the resultative participle or second past active participle) is formed by adding to the infinitive stem the interfix -l- and the endings ъ/a/o. If the stem ends in -t or -d, this consonant is dropped.
Past passive participle
The past passive participle is formed by suffixing to the infinitive stem the following endings:
1. Verbs with stem ending in a consonant, -y or -i:
2. Verbs with stem ending in -a or -ě:
3. Verbs with stem ending in -ę, -u, -i and -ě (obtained by liquid metathesis):
Of the latter verbs, those with stem ending in -i (viti, biti etc.) can also form the past passive participle like the verbs in the first group: bitъ or bijenъ, vitъ or vijenъ etc.).
Perfect
The perfect is formed by combining the l-participle with the imperfective present forms of the auxiliary verb byti.
Pluperfect
The pluperfect can be formed in multiple ways, by combining the l-participle with the perfect, imperfect or aorist formation of the auxiliary verb byti.
Future
The future tense is usually expressed using the present tense form of the perfective verb. Imperfective verbs form the future tense by combining the auxiliary verb (byti, xotěti, načęti, iměti) and the infinitive.
Future perfect
The future perfect is formed by combining the l-participle with the perfective present of the auxiliary verb byti.
Conditional
The conditional (or conditional-optative) modal formation is formed by combining the l-participle with special modal forms of the auxiliary verb byti (with unattested dual forms):
An alternative conditional is formed with the perfective aorist forms of byti:
Primary adverbs
These are original adverbs with difficult to guess etymology and origin.
Pronominal adverbs
Pronominal adverbs are derived by suffixing pronouns (e.g., ov + amo = ovamo, kъ + de = kъde):
Nominal adverbs
Nominal adverbs are derived from nominals or turn by conversion to adverbs which are in fact inflective lexemes with adverbial semantics.
Modal adverbs are created with the suffixes -o or -ě (the endings of accusative and locative singular neuter gender respectively), with no difference in meanings between suffixes, although some adverbs have only the forms in -o (veselo), and some in -ě (javě).
Modal adverbs could also be formed deadjectivally by means of the interfix -ьsk- and the ending -y (by origin, the instrumental plural ending; e.g., slověnьsky).
Adverbs could also be formed with the suffix -ь (pravь, različь) and are by origin probably inherited Proto-Slavic accusative forms.
Frequently occurring are the adverbialized a-stem instrumentals such as jednьnojǫ and also adverbially used oblique cases.
Locative adverbs are by origin mostly petrified locative case forms of nouns: gorě, dolě, nizu, and the same can be said for temporal adverbs: zimě, polu dьne.
Primary prepositions
The primary and non-derived prepositions are of PIE and PSl. heritage:
Secondary prepositions
The secondary prepositions are derived from adverbial expressions: vьslědъ from vь slědъ, prěžde is a comparative form of prědъ etc.
Conjunctions and particles
Conjunctions and particles are not easily separable because they sometimes function as an intensifier, and sometimes as a conjunction.