Trisha Shetty (Editor)

Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Court
  
House of Lords

Location
  
United Kingdom

Citation(s)
  
[1999] UKHL 30, [1999] ICR 827

People also search for
  
Safeway Stores plc v Burrell

Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd [1999] UKHL 30 is a UK labour law case, concerning redundancy.

Contents

Facts

Foyle Meats Ltd's slaughtering business was declining. One production line in the slaughter hall was eliminated and 35 meat plant operatives were made redundant from the slaughter hall. The employees all had flexibility clauses and they sometimes rotated departments to the boning or loading hall, etc. The dismissed employees claimed they were not redundant because the employer still needed workers under the same terms, just in different departments.

Judgment

Lord Irvine LC held that the operatives were redundant and that "the language of the [Employment Rights Act 1996 section 139(1)(b)] is in my view simplicity itself". He referred to Nelson v BBC which had wrongly propagated the "contract test" view, which was wrong. There was a simple causation test to apply, based on the word "attributable" in the statute. Did diminishing demand for labour cause the dismissal?

References

Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd Wikipedia