Supriya Ghosh (Editor)

McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Commission

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Majority
  
J. Marshall

End date
  
1973

Full case name
  
McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Commission

Citations
  
411 U.S. 164 (more) 93 S. Ct. 1257; 36 L. Ed. 2d 129

Prior history
  
McClanahan v. State Tax Commission, 484 P.2d 221 (Ariz. App. Div. 1 1971).

Similar
  
Menominee Tribe v United St, Talton v Mayes, Ex parte Crow Dog

McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Comm'n, 411 U.S. 164 (1973), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States holding that Arizona has no jurisdiction to impose a tax on the income of Navajo Indians residing on the Navajo Reservation and whose income is wholly derived from reservation sources.

Contents

Background

Rosalind McClanahan was an enrolled member of the Navajo Nation in Arizona. In 1967, all of her income came from work on the Navajo Reservation, and for which $16.20 was withheld from her wages. She requested a refund of the entire amount and protested the collection of state taxes. When the state declined her claim, she filed an action in the Arizona Superior Court. The court dismissed her case for failure to state a claim and McClanahan appealed. The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed. The Arizona Supreme Court declined to hear the case, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to hear the case.

Opinion of the Court

Justice Thurgood Marshall delivered the opinion of a unanimous court. Marshall found that there was nothing in federal law that authorized Arizona to collect a state income tax from an Indian that earned the income on the reservation. The case was reversed.

References

McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Commission Wikipedia