Puneet Varma (Editor)

Kawashima v. Holder

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Docket nos.
  
10-577

Argument
  
Oral argument

Citations
  
565 U.S. ___ (more)

Full case name
  
Akio Kawashima, et ux., Petitioners v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General

Prior history
  
Appeal of deportation order denied (Bd. Immigr. App., 200?); reversed in part sub nom. Kawashima v. Gonzales 503 F.3d 997 (9th Cir. 2007, withdrawn); reconsidered and fully reversed sub nom. Kawashima v. Mukasey, 530 F.3d 1111 (9th Cir. 2008, withdrawn); reconsidered anew and affirmed 615 F.3d 1043 (9th Cir., 2010); certiorari granted 563 U.S. ___ (2011).

Majority
  
Thomas, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Alito, Sotomayor

Kawashima v. Holder, 565 U.S. ___ (2012), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "filing a false tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. Section 7206 qualifies as an aggravated felony under the Immigration and Nationality Act when the Government's revenue loss exceeds $10,000."

Contents

Background

Akio and Fusako Kawashima, Japanese nationals who legally resided in the U.S., owned the successful Nihon Seibutsu Kagaku restaurant in Thousand Oaks, California which filed false tax returns.

Opinion of the Court

In a 6–3 opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court held that "filing a false tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. Section 7206 qualifies as an aggravated felony under the Immigration and Nationality Act when the Government's revenue loss exceeds $10,000."

References

Kawashima v. Holder Wikipedia


Similar Topics