Supriya Ghosh (Editor)

Hitchin–Thorpe inequality

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit

In differential geometry the Hitchin–Thorpe inequality is a relation which restricts the topology of 4-manifolds that carry an Einstein metric.

Contents

Statement of the Hitchin–Thorpe inequality

Let M be a compact, oriented, smooth four-dimensional manifold. If there exists a Riemannian metric on M which is an Einstein metric, then following inequality holds

χ ( M ) 3 2 | τ ( M ) | ,

where χ ( M ) is the Euler characteristic of M and τ ( M ) is the signature of M . This inequality was first stated by John Thorpe in a footnote to a 1969 paper focusing on manifolds of higher dimension. Nigel Hitchin then rediscovered the inequality, and gave a complete characterization of the equality case in 1974; he found that if ( M , g ) is an Einstein manifold with χ ( M ) = 3 2 | τ ( M ) | , then ( M , g ) must be a flat torus, a Calabi–Yau manifold, or a quotient thereof.

Idea of the proof

The main ingredients in the proof of the Hitchin–Thorpe inequality are the decomposition of the Riemann curvature tensor and the Generalized Gauss-Bonnet theorem.

Failure of the converse

A natural question to ask is whether the Hitchin–Thorpe inequality provides a sufficient condition for the existence of Einstein metrics. In 1995, Claude LeBrun and Andrea Sambusetti independently showed that the answer is no: there exist infinitely many non-homeomorphic compact, smooth, oriented 4-manifolds M that carry no Einstein metrics but nevertheless satisfy

χ ( M ) > 3 2 | τ ( M ) | .

LeBrun's examples are actually simply connected, and the relevant obstruction depends on the smooth structure of the manifold. By contrast, Sambusetti's obstruction only applies to 4-manifolds with infinite fundamental group, but the volume-entropy estimate he uses to prove non-existence only depends on the homotopy type of the manifold.

References

Hitchin–Thorpe inequality Wikipedia