Introduced on May 7, 2013 | Number of co-sponsors 1 | |
 | ||
Full title To amend title 10, United States Code, to require an Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in response to making protected communications regarding sexual assault. Sponsored by Rep. Jackie Walorski (R, IN-2) U.S.C. section(s) affected 10 U.S.C. § 1034(c)(2)(A), 10 U.S.C. §§ 920–920c | ||
The bill entitled To amend title 10, United States Code, to require an Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in response to making protected communications regarding sexual assault (H
Contents
The bill is a reaction to an increase in sexual assaults taking place in the military, an increase of more than a third between 2010 and 2012. In 2012, there were an estimated 26,000 assaults, with exact numbers unknown because many people still fear the consequences of reporting what happened to them. Currently, the Inspector General is required to investigate whether sexual harassment reports led to retaliatory actions against the person making the report. This bill, if passed, would expand those investigations to include looking at whether retaliatory action also happened in response to report of rape, sexual assault, or sexual misconduct.
Provisions/Elements of the bill
This summary is based largely on the summary provided by the Congressional Research Service, a public domain source.
If passed, the bill would require the Inspector General of the Department of Defense (DOD), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with respect to the Coast Guard, or any of the military departments to investigate allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in response to making protected communications to such Inspector General regarding alleged instances of rape, sexual assault, or other forms of sexual misconduct in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Procedural history
H