ISO 639-2 cho | Ethnicity Choctaw | |
![]() | ||
Native speakers 10,400 and decreasing (2010 census) Language family MuskogeanWesternChoctaw |
The Choctaw language, traditionally spoken by the Native American Choctaw people of the southeastern United States, is a member of the Muskogean family. Although Chickasaw is sometimes listed as a dialect of Choctaw, more extensive documentation of Chickasaw has shown that Choctaw and Chickasaw are best treated as separate but closely related languages.
Contents
- Orthography
- Modern linguistic variant
- Dialects
- Phonology
- Consonants
- Free variation
- Phonological processes of consonants
- Pitch
- Syllable structure
- Rhythmic lengthening
- Smallest possible word
- Glide insertion
- i deletion
- l infix assimilation
- Phonological processes of the suffix li
- Schwa insertion
- Vowel deletion
- Verbal morphology
- Verb prefixes
- Verb suffixes
- Verbal infixes
- Noun prefixes
- Noun suffixes
- Word order and case marking
- Examples
- References
Orthography
The written Choctaw language is based upon English version of the Roman alphabet and was developed in conjunction with the civilization program of the United States in the early 19th century. Although there are other variations of the Choctaw alphabet, the three most commonly seen are the Byington (Original), Byington/Swanton (Linguistic), and Modern (Mississippi Choctaw).
Modern (linguistic variant)
Many publications by linguists about the Choctaw language use a slight variant of the "modern (Mississippi Choctaw)" orthography listed here, where long vowels are written as doubled. In the "linguistic" version, the acute accent shows the position of the pitch accent, rather than the length of the vowel.
The discussion of Choctaw grammar below uses the linguistic variant of the orthography.
Dialects
There are three dialects of Choctaw (Mithun 1999):
- "Native" Choctaw on the Choctaw Nation in southeastern Oklahoma
- Mississippi Choctaw of Oklahoma on Chickasaw Nation of south central Oklahoma (near Durwood)
- Choctaw of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians near Philadelphia, Mississippi
Other speakers live near Tallahassee, Florida, and with the Koasati in Louisiana, and also a few speakers live in Texas and California.
Phonology
Consonants
- ^ The only voiced stop is /b/. The voiceless stops /p/, /t/, and /k/ may become partially voiced between vowels, especially /k/ and for male speakers. Also, the voiceless stops are slightly aspirated at the onset of words and before stressed syllables, behaving like English voiceless plosives.
- ^ According to one analysis, all words must end in a consonant. Words apparently ending in a vowel actually have a glottal stop /ʔ/ or a glottal fricative /h/ as the final consonant. Such consonants become realized when suffixes are attached.
- ^ The phonemes /s/ and /ʃ/ are neutralized at the end of words.
Free variation
- /ɬ/, the voiceless lateral fricative, is pronounced as a voiceless dental fricative /θ/.
- The voiceless labiodental fricative /f/ is pronounced as a voiceless bilabial fricative /ɸ/.
Phonological processes of consonants
- ^ In closed syllables, [ɪ], [ʊ], and [ʌ] occur as allophonic variants of /i/, /o/, and /a/. Traditional orthography distinguishes the lax allophones from the tense vowels but failed to distinguish phonemic long vowels from phonemic short ones.
- ^ Nasal vowels are not distinguished by duration as are oral vowels. However, nasal vowels are phonetically long, suggesting an underlying phoneme /N/.
Pitch
- In Choctaw, very few words are distinguished only by pitch accent. Nouns in Choctaw have pitch realization at the penultimate syllable or the ultimate syllable. Verbs in Choctaw will have pitch realization at morphemes indicating tense, but sometimes, pitch directly precedes the tense morpheme.
Syllable structure
Syllables of Choctaw
- As is in the chart above, there are three syllable structure types in Choctaw: light, heavy, and super heavy. Possible syllables in Choctaw must contain at least one vowel of any quality.
- Syllables cannot end with a consonant clusters CC. However, there is an exception with the structure *(C)VCC if a word in Choctaw ends with the suffix /-t/.
- Syllables do not begin with consonant clusters CC, buy there is an exception in an initial /i-/ deletion, which results in a syllable *CCV .
Rhythmic lengthening
Smallest possible word
Glide insertion
- Where V: is oo
- boo-a-h→bóowah
- Where V: can be either ii or aa
- talaa-a-h→talaayah
/i-/ deletion
/-l-/ infix assimilation
Phonological processes of the suffix /-li/
Schwa insertion
Vowel deletion
- For most vowel deletion cases, the preceding short vowel is deleted at the morpheme boundary.
- If a class II suffix attaches to a word that results with two short vowels occurring together, the short vowel that follows the class II suffix is deleted.
Verbal morphology
Choctaw verbs display a wide range of inflectional and derivational morphology. In Choctaw, the category of verb may also include words that would be categorized as adjectives or quantifiers in English. Verbs may be preceded by up to three prefixes and followed by as many as five suffixes. In addition, verb roots may contain infixes that convey aspectual information.
Verb prefixes
The verbal prefixes convey information about the arguments of the verb: how many there are and their person and number features. The prefixes can be divided into three sorts: agreement markers, applicative markers, and anaphors (reflexives and reciprocals). The prefixes occur in the following order: agreement-anaphor-applicative-verb stem.
Agreement affixes
The agreement affixes are shown in the following chart. All are prefixes except -li, a suffix.
I, II, and III are neutral labels for the three person marking paradigms. Some authors (Ulrich 1986, Davies, 1986) have called them actor–patient–dative or nominative–accusative–dative.
The 1sg I agreement marker is /-li/, the only suffix among the agreement markers. It is discussed in this section along with the other agreement markers.
I, II, and III agreement are conditioned by various kinds of arguments. Transitive active verbs show the most predictable pattern. With a typical transitive active verb, the subject will take I agreement, the direct object will take II agreement, and the indirect object will take III agreement.
As the chart above shows, there is no person-number agreement for third person arguments. Consider the following paradigms:
When a transitive verb occurs with more than one agreement prefix, I prefixes precede II and III prefixes:
Iichipí̱satok.Ii-chi-pí̱sa-tok1pI-2sII-see⟨NGR⟩-PT'We saw you.'Ishpimanoolitok.Ish-pim-anooli-tok.2sI-1pIII-tell-PT'You told us.'Intransitive verbs show more complicated patterns of agreement. For intransitive verbs, the subjects of active verbs typically trigger I agreement, the subjects of stative verbs typically trigger II agreement, and III agreement is found with the subjects of some psychological verbs.
Baliililitok.Baliili-li-tokrun-1sI-PT'I ran.'Saniyah.Sa-niya-h.1sII-fat-TNS'I am fat.'a̱ponnah.a̱-ponna-h.1sIII-skilled-TNS'I am skilled.'This type of morphology is generally referred to as active–stative.
Negatives
The set of agreement markers labelled N above is used with negatives. Negation is multiply marked, requiring that an agreement marker from the N set replace the ordinary I agreement, the verb appear in the lengthened grade (see discussion below), and that the suffix /-o(k)-/ follow the verb, with deletion of the preceding final vowel. The optional suffix /-kii/ may be added after /-o(k)-/. Consider the following example:
Compare this with the affirmative counterpart:
To make this example negative, the 1sI suffix /-li/ is replaced by the 1sN prefix /ak-/; the verb root iya is lengthened and accented to yield íiya; the suffix /-o/ is added, the final vowel of iiya is deleted, and the suffix /-kii/ is added.
Anaphoric prefixes
Reflexives are indicated with the /ili-/ prefix, and reciprocals with /itti-/:
Verb suffixes
While the verbal prefixes indicate relations between the verb and its arguments, the suffixes cover a wider semantic range, including information about valence, modality, tense and evidentiality.The following examples show modal and tense suffixes like /-aachii̱/ 'irrealis'(approximately equal to future), /-tok/ 'past tense', /-h/ 'default tenses':
Baliilih.Baliili-h.run-TNS'She runs.'Baliilaachi̱h.Baliili-aachi̱-h.run-IRR-TNS'She will run.'There are also suffixes that show evidentiality, or the source of evidence for a statement, as in the following pair:
Nipi’ awashlihli.Nipi’ awashli-hlimeat fry-first:hand'She fried the meat.' (I saw/heard/smelled her do it.)Nipi’ awashlitoka̱sha.Nipi’ awashli-tok-a̱shameat fry-PT-guess'She fried the meat.' (I guess)There are also suffixes of illocutionary force which may indicate that the sentence is a question, an exclamation, or a command:
Awashlitoko̱?Awashli-tok-o̱fry-PT-Q'Did she fry it?'Chahta’ siahokii!Chahta’ si-a-h-okiiChoctaw 1sII-be-TNS-EXCL'I'm Choctaw!' or 'I certainly am a Choctaw!'Verbal infixes
Choctaw verb stems have various infixes that indicate their aspect. These stem variants are traditionally referred to as 'grades'. The table below shows the grades of Choctaw, along with their main usage.
Some examples that show the grades follow:
In this example the l-grade appears because of the suffixes /-na/ 'different subject' and /-o(k)/ 'negative':
... lowat táahana falaamat akíiyokiittook.lowa-t táaha-na falaama-t ak-íiya-o-kii-ttookburn-SS complete⟨LGR⟩-DS return-SS 1sN-go⟨LGR⟩-NEG-NEG-DPAST'... (the school) burned down and I didn't go back.'The g-grade and y-grade typically get translated into English as "finally VERB-ed":
Taloowah.Taloowa-hsing-TNS'He sang.'Tálloowah.Tálloowa-hsing⟨GGR⟩-TNS'He finally sang.'The hn-grade is usually translated as 'kept on VERBing':
Ohó̱bana nittak pókkooli’ oshtattook.Ohó̱ba-na nittak pókkooli’ oshta-ttookrain⟨HNGR⟩-DS day ten four-DPAST'It kept on raining for forty days.'The h-grade is usually translated "just VERB-ed" or "VERB-ed for a short time":
Nóhsih.Nóhsi-hsleep⟨HGR⟩-TNS'He took a quick nap.Noun prefixes
Nouns have prefixes that show agreement with a possessor. Agreement markers from class II are used on a lexically specified closed class of nouns, which includes many (but not all) of the kinship terms and body parts. This is the class that is generally labeled inalienable.
sanoshkobo’ 'my head'sa-noshkobo’1sII-headchinoshkobo’ 'your head'chi-noshkobo’2sII-headnoshkobo’ 'his/her/its/their head'noshkobo’headsashki’ 'my mother'sa-ishki’1sII-motherchishki’ 'your mother'chi-ishki’2sII-motherNouns that are not lexically specified for II agreement use the III agreement markers:
a̱ki’ 'my father'a̱-ki’1sIII-fatheramofi’ 'my dog'am-ofi’1sIII-dogAlthough systems of this type are generally described with the terms alienable and inalienable, this terminology is not particularly appropriate for Choctaw, since alienability implies a semantic distinction between types of nouns. The morphological distinction between nouns taking II agreement and III agreement in Choctaw only partly coincides with the semantic notion of alienability.
Noun suffixes
Choctaw nouns can be followed by various determiner and case-marking suffixes, as in the following examples, where we see determiners such as /-ma/ 'that', /-pa/ 'this', and /-akoo/ 'contrast' and case-markers /-(y)at/ 'nominative' and /-(y)a̱/ 'accusative':
alla’ naknimatalla’ nakni-m-atchild male-that-NOM'that boy (nominative)'Hoshiit itti chaahamako̱ o̱biniilih.Hoshi’-at itti’ chaaha-m-ako̱ o̱-biniili-hbird-NOM tree tall-that-CNTR:ACC SUPERESSIVE-sit-TNS'The bird is sitting on that tall tree.' (Not on the short one.)The last example shows that nasalizing the last vowel of the preceding N is a common way to show the accusative case.
Word order and case marking
The simplest sentences in Choctaw consist of a verb and a tense marker, as in the following examples:o̱batok.o̱ba-tokrain-PT'It rained.'Niyah.niya-hfat-TNS'She/he/it is fat, they are fat.'Pí̱satok.pí̱sa-toksee⟨NGR⟩-PT'She/he/it/they saw her/him/it/them.'As these examples show, there are no obligatory noun phrases in a Choctaw sentence, nor is there any verbal agreement that indicates a third person subject or object. There is no indication of grammatical gender, and for third person arguments there is no indication of number. (There are, however, some verbs with suppletive forms that indicate the number of a subject or object, e.g. iyah 'to go (sg.)', ittiyaachih 'to go (du.)', and ilhkolih 'to go (pl)'.)When there is an overt subject, it is obligatorily marked with the nominative case /-at/. Subjects precede the verb
Hoshiyat apatok.hoshi'-at apa-tokbird-NOM eat-PT'The birds ate them.'When there is an overt object, it is optionally marked with the accusative case /-a̱/
Hoshiyat sho̱shi(-ya̱) apatok.hoshi'-at sho̱shi'(-a̱) apa-tok.bird-NOM bug-(ACC) eat-PT'The birds ate the bugs.'The Choctaw sentence is normally verb-final, and so the head of the sentence is last.
Some other phrases in Choctaw also have their head at the end. Possessors precede the possessed noun in the Noun Phrase:
ofi' hohchifo'dog name'the dog's name'Choctaw has postpositional phrases with the postposition after its object:
tamaaha' bili̱katown near'near a town'Examples
Some common Choctaw phrases (written in the "Modern" orthography):
Other Choctaw words:
Counting to twenty:
At " Native Nashville " web [1], there is an Online Choctaw Language Tutor, with Pronunciation Guide and four lessons: Small Talk, Animals, Food and Numbers.