Rahul Sharma (Editor)

Banco Español de Crédito SA v Camino

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Case number
  
C-618/10

Nationality of parties
  
Spanish

End date
  
June 14, 2012

ECLI
  
ECLI:EU:C:2012:349

Location
  
Europe

People also search for
  
Brusse v Jahani BV

Full case name
  
Banco Español de Crédito SA v Joaquín Calderón Camino,

Banco Español de Crédito SA v Camino (2012) Case C-618/10 is a case relevant for European contract law concerning the scope of consumer protection in the Unfair Terms Directive under EU law.

Contents

Facts

Calderon Camino borrowed €30,000 from Banesto to buy a car at 7.95% interest, and APR 8.89%, and 29% on late payments. Banesto claimed €29,381.95 for unpaid monthly repayments, interest and costs.

First instance held the 29% rate to be automatically unfair, given it was 20% above the nominal, fixing the rate instead at 19%. Banesto complained that the consumer had not asked for this, and said national law prevented a court assessing a term for unfairness on its own motion. The Barcelona Provincial Court referred the question to the ECJ.

Judgment

The European Court of Justice's First Chamber held that the court had the right and the duty to assess the fairness of a clause. However, it could not substitute an interest rate: it had to find the interest rate void, while leaving the rest of the contract intact.

References

Banco Español de Crédito SA v Camino Wikipedia