The infinitive of Armenian verbs is formed with the stem, the theme vowel, and the affix -լ (-l).
The endings reflect the number of conjugations possible. Western Armenian is conservative, retaining three conjugations in a, e, and i, while Eastern Armenian has collapsed I and II:
There are two main stems per verb, the present stem and past stem. For conjugations I/II, the past stem is identical to the present stem, which is basically the verb minus the theme vowel and ending:
The augment for the third conjugation is sometimes in -եց (-ec῾).
The number and type of participles varies by dialect.
Both Eastern and Western Armenian form the common future participle in -լու (-lu). Western Armenian has one additional future participle in -լիք (-lik῾):
Eastern Armenian has three present participles, while Western Armenian has one. The two Eastern participles are in -ում (-um) (for all verb classes) and -լիս (-lis); both affixes attach to the present stem. Both have a common present participle in -ող (-oġ), which attaches to the past stem; it is sometimes used as an agentive noun: ուսանող (usanoġ student) [fr. ուսանել usanel to study)].
All affixes here attach to the past stem. Both dialects have a common past passive participle in -ած (WA -aj/EA -aç). Where the dialects differ is the past active participle. The Western Armenian participle is -եր (-er) for all conjugations, while Eastern Armenian has -ել (-el).
Armenian features within its verbal system a system that encodes person and number, as well as tense, mood, and aspect (see following section for more.)
Armenian inherited from Indo-European two sets of synthetic affixes corresponding roughly to a "present" or general series, and a past series:
How these affixes are used varies between the two modern dialects of Armenian.
Both dialects have five moods: indicative, conditional, optative/subjunctive, necessitative, imperative; of these only the imperative has no tense distinction. The number of tenses varies by dialect. Aspect is divided roughly the same in both dialects, but the distribution is slightly different.
Both Eastern and Western feature one present, one future, and two past tenses (imperfect, preterite). Their formation varies by dialect.
Formation of the present tense differs between Eastern and Western. In form, the present indicative of Eastern Armenian has no corresponding Western formation. However, the Western present indicative is formed identically to the Eastern present conditional.
Eastern Armenian uses the -ում (-um) participle with the present tense of Eastern Armenian verb լինել (linel "to be"). Western Armenian uses a synthetic general form of the verb preceded by the particle կը gë /gә/. The synthetic form conjugates according to the verb's theme vowel (i.e., e, i, or a).In Armenian, final /j/ in polysyllabic words is silent.
The formation of the imperfect is similar to the present-tense formation in both dialects. Eastern Armenian uses the -ում (-um) participle with the imperfect of verb լինել (linel "to be"). Western Armenian uses a synthetic imperfect form of the verb preceded by the particle կը gë /gә/.
Note that in all forms, Eastern and Western, that feature the combination էի (e.g., սիրում էիմ/կը սիրէիմ, etc.), there is an epenthetic yod: sirum ēi [siˈɹum eji] or [siˈɾum eji]; gë sirēi [ɡə siɾeˈji].
Like the formation of the present tense, the future tense in Armenian intersect two varying constructions with opposite meanings. The Eastern future tense is made with the future participle in -լու (-lu) with the present tense of verb լինել (linel). (This Eastern form is identical to the Western Armenian non-past necessitative (see below.)) The Western future tense is made with the general synthetic verb preceded by the particle պիտի (bidi). (This Western form is identical to the Eastern Armenian non-past necessitative (see below.))
Note that in all Eastern forms that feature the combination ու + ե (e.g., կարդալու եմ, etc.), epenthetic yod appears: kardalu em [kaɹdaˈlujem] or [kaɾdaˈlujem].
In various grammars, this is called the preterite, the perfect, or sometimes the aorist. Both Eastern and Western Armenian use a synthetic preterite, which is formed by deleting the infinitive marker and theme vowel, then:
· Class I and II verbs (in both dialects) add -եց (-ec῾);
· Class III verbs add -աց (-ac῾).
The preterite affixes are similar to the imperfect endings of the verb "to be" (Eastern լինել linel, Western ըլլալ ëllal)
In Class III verbs (a-thematic verbs), the preterite stem and the past stem are identical.
The optative mood (called the subjunctive in some grammars) in Armenian is identical in both dialects. There are two tenses: non-past (present, etc...) and past (perfect, etc. ...).
The non-past optative is the simple "present" conjugated form, as compared to other Indo-European languages:
1Historically, verbs of the third conjucation ended in final յ, which in traditional orthography is silent in word final position. Due to spelling reforms conducted in the earliest 20th century, final յ is missing from the Eastern conjugation
The past optative is the simple "imperfect" conjugated form, as compared to other Indo-European languages:
1 In both dialects, the combinations եի and էի are pronounced as though spelt "եյի" and "էյի", meaning that սիրեի and սիրէի are both pronounced [siɹeji]. The latent yod յ is written and pronounced in class III verbs.
The conditional is mostly similar in both dialects.
In Eastern Armenian, the non-past conditional is formed by affixing կ- before the non-past optative. With this formation, Eastern Armenian also has a past conditional with k- plus past optative. Due to phonological restrictions, կ is pronounced [kë] before another consonant: կկարդա [këkaɹˈda] (He would read); կկարդային [këkaɹdaˈjin] (They would have read').
Western Armenian does the same, but it has another form identical to its Future in the Past (for the past conditional). The former has always been more prevalent, while the latter is falling in disuse.
The Eastern conditional forms, with slight orthographic variation, are identical to the Western present and imperfect indicative forms:
The second (less prevalent) Western Armenian conditional is identical to the Eastern Past Necessitative.
1Optional spoken forms
In both Eastern and Western Armenian, the imperative consists of the affirmative and the negative, and singular and plural forms (based on the second person you).
Both dialects have what is known as the necessitative mood (also found in Turkish). Both dialects have a past and a non-past necessitative. Eastern Armenian forms its necessitative by adding particle piti before the optative forms. Western Armenian forms its necessitative with the lu future participle plus the forms of әllal (to be)
Note that the EA particle piti is orthographically identical to the Western particle bidi, meaning that the Eastern necessitative forms are identical in form to the Western future indicative and conditional. Also note that the Western necessitative forms correspond to Eastern Eastern future indicative (and future perfect (see below)):
Armenian, like most languages, has two voices: Active and Passive.
All the forms above are Active. To make them passive, add the identifying letter վ in front of the ending.
Present and past perfect
Note: In Western Armenian, the present perfect and past perfect have two forms. One is formed by the past active participle and the verb to be (սիրեր եմ), while the other uses the more prevalent past (passive) participle (սիրած եմ). The first may denote the mediative (evidential or non evidential), the inferential, or the reportative. The second is more akin to the Eastern Perfect and the resultative.
The present perfect is formed with the l-past participle plus the present form of լինել (linel "to be"). The past perfect (pluperfect) is the l-past participle plus the imperfect of linel.
Future perfect (future in the past)
The Eastern future perfect (future in the past) indicative is formed like the future indicative tense (using the lu-participle), substituting the present forms of the verb լինել linel with the imperfect.
In Western Armenian, it is identical to the imperfect, substituting կը with պիտի.
This tense is used with events which were most likely to happen, which were to happen, according to the speaker's firm conviction, but they either haven't happened, or it's not known.
A table of the perfect forms thus:
A comparison of forms
There are two tables, showing the full conjugation of each dialect's verb paradigms, Eastern and Western.