Arkansas Best Corp. v. Commissioner

Updated on Dec 08, 2024

Edit

Comment

End date 1988
Full case name Arkansas Best Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Citations 485 U.S. 212 (more)108 S.Ct. 971; 99 L.Ed.2d 183 Prior history 83 T.C. 640; 800 F.2d 215 Majority Marshall, joined by unanimous

Arkansas Best Corporation v. Commissioner, 485 U.S. 212 (1988), is a United States Supreme Court decision that helps taxpayers classify whether or not the sale of an asset is an ordinary or capital gain or loss for income tax purposes.

Facts

Arkansas Best, a diversified holding company acquired a large percentage of the stock of the National Bank of Commerce in Dallas, Texas. When the real estate market in Dallas faltered, Arkansas Best sold a large portion of its stake in the Bank at a loss. Arkansas Best claimed a deduction for an ordinary loss of nearly $10 million from the sale. The Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service disallowed the deduction, finding that it was a capital, not ordinary loss.

Issue

Was the stock properly a capital asset as defined by I.R.C. § 1221? Should the Court read § 1221 broadly as it had in Corn Products Refining Co. v. Commissioner, 350 U.S. 46 (1955)?

Holding

The Eighth Circuit reversed the Tax Court’s determination that the loss was an ordinary loss since the Bank stock fell within the general definition of “capital asset” in I.R.C. § 1221 and did not fall within any of the statutory exceptions in the section. A taxpayer’s motivation in purchasing an asset is irrelevant to its classification.

Reasoning

The broad definition of the term “capital asset” explicitly makes irrelevant any consideration of the property’s connection with the taxpayer’s business. The motive behind the purchase of the asset is not mentioned as a factor in § 1221.

Congress does not direct the Court to read § 1221 liberally. Congress intended the specific exceptions explicitly contained in § 1221.

The holding in Corn Products is that hedging transactions that are an integral part of a business’ inventory-purchase system fall within the inventory exclusion of § 1221. This ruling does not apply to the facts of this case.

The capital stock held by Arkansas Best falls within the broad definition of a “capital asset” in § 1221 and is outside the classes of property excluded from capital-asset status.

Importance

This case signals that the Court will closely read the exclusions in I.R.C. § 1221 in classifying capital versus ordinary losses. By sticking with the explicit language of the section the Court clarifies this section for other courts and practitioners interpreting and implementing the Code.

References

Arkansas Best Corp. v. Commissioner Wikipedia

(Text) CC BY-SA