Girish Mahajan (Editor)

Worsdale v Polglase

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Full case name
  
Worsdale v Polglase

Date decided
  
June 25, 1981

Ruling court
  
High Court of New Zealand

Citation(s)
  
[1981] 1 NZLR 722

Judge sitting
  
Ronald Davison

Worsdale v Polglase

Worsdale v Polglase [1981] 1 NZLR 722 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding relief under the Contractual Remedies Act 1979 where a contract is repudiated by one of the parties.

Contents

Background

The Worsdales entered into a contract in 1980 to purchase the Polglase's Paraparaumu home for $60,000, paying $6,000 deposit.

To finance their purchase, the Worsdales were expecting $20,000 from a business transaction, plus a further $28,000 from the sale of a property. However, 21 days before the date of settlement, both these funds had not materialized, and as a result, they advised the vendors that they had repudiated the contract.

On the following day, the vendors advised the Worsdales that they had now cancelled the contract, and on the same day, resold the property to another party for $60,000.

The Worsdales sought relief from the courts for their deposit of $6,000 that was forfeited

Held

The court held that a deposit of 10% was customary, and refused to grant any relief here for a forfeited deposit of 10%.

References

Worsdale v Polglase Wikipedia