Variation of parameters

History

The method of variation of parameters was introduced by the Swiss-born mathematician Leonhard Euler (1707–1783) and completed by the Italian-French mathematician Joseph-Louis Lagrange (1736–1813). A forerunner of the method of variation of a celestial body's orbital elements appeared in Euler's work in 1748, while he was studying the mutual perturbations of Jupiter and Saturn. In his 1749 study of the motions of the earth, Euler obtained differential equations for the orbital elements; and in 1753 he applied the method to his study of the motions of the moon. Lagrange first used the method in 1766. Between 1778 and 1783, Lagrange further developed the method both in a series of memoirs on variations in the motions of the planets and in another series of memoirs on determining the orbit of a comet from three observations. (It should be noted that Euler and Lagrange applied this method to nonlinear differential equations and that, instead of varying the coefficients of linear combinations of solutions to homogeneous equations, they varied the constants of the unperturbed motions of the celestial bodies.) During 1808-1810, Lagrange gave the method of variation of parameters its final form in a series of papers. The central result of his study was the system of planetary equations in the form of Lagrange, which described the evolution of the Keplerian parameters (orbital elements) of a perturbed orbit.

In his description of evolving orbits, Lagrange set a reduced two-body problem as an unperturbed solution, and presumed that all perturbations come from the gravitational pull which the bodies other than the primary exert at the secondary (orbiting) body. Accordingly, his method implied that the perturbations depend solely on the position of the secondary, but not on its velocity. In the 20th century, celestial mechanics began to consider interactions which depend on both positions and velocities (relativistic corrections, atmospheric drag, inertial forces). Therefore, the method of variation of parameters used by Lagrange was extended to the situation with velocity-dependent forces.

Description of method

Given an ordinary non-homogeneous linear differential equation of order n

let y 1 ( x ) , … , y n ( x ) be a fundamental system of solutions of the corresponding homogeneous equation

Then a particular solution to the non-homogeneous equation is given by

where the c i ( x ) are differentiable functions which are assumed to satisfy the conditions

Starting with (iii), repeated differentiation combined with repeated use of (iv) gives

One last differentiation gives

By substituting (iii) into (i) and applying (v) and (vi) it follows that

The linear system (iv and vii) of n equations can then be solved using Cramer's rule yielding

where W ( x ) is the Wronskian determinant of the fundamental system and W i ( x ) is the Wronskian determinant of the fundamental system with the i-th column replaced by ( 0 , 0 , … , b ( x ) ) .

The particular solution to the non-homogeneous equation can then be written as

First order equation

The general solution of the corresponding homogeneous equation (written below) is the complementary solution to our original (inhomogeneous) equation:

This homogeneous differential equation can be solved by different methods, for example separation of variables:

The complementary solution to our original equation is therefore:

Now we return to solving the non-homogeneous equation:

Using the method variation of parameters, the particular solution is formed by multiplying the complementary solution by an unknown function C(x):

By substituting the particular solution into the non-homogeneous equation, we can find C(x):

We only need a single particular solution, so we arbitrarily select C 1 = 0 for simplicity. Therefore the particular solution is:

The final solution of the differential equation is:

Specific second order equation

Let us solve

We want to find the general solution to the differential equation, that is, we want to find solutions to the homogeneous differential equation

The characteristic equation is:

Since λ = − 2 is a repeated root, we have to introduce a factor of x for one solution to ensure linear independence: u₁ = e^−2x and u₂ = xe^−2x. The Wronskian of these two functions is

Because the Wronskian is non-zero, the two functions are linearly independent, so this is in fact the general solution for the homogeneous differential equation (and not a mere subset of it).

We seek functions A(x) and B(x) so A(x)u₁ + B(x)u₂ is a general solution of the non-homogeneous equation. We need only calculate the integrals

Recall that for this example

That is,

where C 1 and C 2 are constants of integration.

General second order equation

We have a differential equation of the form

and we define the linear operator

where D represents the differential operator. We therefore have to solve the equation L u ( x ) = f ( x ) for u ( x ) , where L and f ( x ) are known.

We must solve first the corresponding homogeneous equation:

by the technique of our choice. Once we've obtained two linearly independent solutions to this homogeneous differential equation (because this ODE is second-order) — call them u₁ and u₂ — we can proceed with variation of parameters.

Now, we seek the general solution to the differential equation u G ( x ) which we assume to be of the form

Here, A ( x ) and B ( x ) are unknown and u 1 ( x ) and u 2 ( x ) are the solutions to the homogeneous equation. (Observe that if A ( x ) and B ( x ) are constants, then L u G ( x ) = 0 .) Since the above is only one equation and we have two unknown functions, it is reasonable to impose a second condition. We choose the following:

Now,

Differentiating again (omitting intermediary steps)

Now we can write the action of L upon u_G as

Since u₁ and u₂ are solutions, then

We have the system of equations

Expanding,

So the above system determines precisely the conditions

We seek A(x) and B(x) from these conditions, so, given

we can solve for (A′(x), B′(x))^T, so

where W denotes the Wronskian of u₁ and u₂. (We know that W is nonzero, from the assumption that u₁ and u₂ are linearly independent.) So,

While homogeneous equations are relatively easy to solve, this method allows the calculation of the coefficients of the general solution of the inhomogeneous equation, and thus the complete general solution of the inhomogeneous equation can be determined.

Note that A ( x ) and B ( x ) are each determined only up to an arbitrary additive constant (the constant of integration). Adding a constant to A ( x ) or B ( x ) does not change the value of L u G ( x ) because the extra term is just a linear combination of u₁ and u₂, which is a solution of L by definition.