Rahul Sharma (Editor)

United States v. Dixon

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Majority
  
Scalia

End date
  
1993

Full case name
  
United States v. Alvin Dixon and Michael Foster

Citations
  
509 U.S. 688 (more) 113 S. Ct. 2849; 125 L. Ed. 2d 556; 1993 U.S. LEXIS 4405

Prior history
  
On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Concurrence
  
Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas

Concurrence
  
White, joined by Stevens, Souter

Case 14 1124 united states v dixon 2015 01 09


United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688 (1993), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning double jeopardy. The case overruled Grady v. Corbin (1990) and revived the traditional Blockburger standard. The case held that subsequent convictions for offenses that contained the same elements were violative of the Double Jeopardy Clause.

Contents

Background

Alvin Dixon was arrested for murder in the District of Columbia and released on bail, on the condition that he not commit any criminal offense, or he would be held in contempt of court. While awaiting trial, Dixon was arrested and indicted for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and was found guilty of contempt and sentenced to 180 days in jail. Dixon moved to dismiss this indictment on double jeopardy grounds because he argued that the prosecution was secondary to his first offense.

Michael Foster's wife obtained a civil protection order against him due to domestic attacks. The order required that he not molest, assault, or in any manner threaten or physically abuse her. Later his wife sought to have him held in contempt for violation of that order. Foster also filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that his double jeopardy rights were violated because his contempt charges arose out of the original prosecution.

Opinion of the Court

The court concluded that the Double Jeopardy Clause prohibited the subsequent prosecutions of Foster for assault and Dixon for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, but did not prohibit the subsequent prosecutions of Foster for threatening to injure another or for assault with intent to kill.

References

United States v. Dixon Wikipedia