Girish Mahajan (Editor)

United States Arbitration Association

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit

United States Arbitration Association (USADR) is an alternative dispute resolution company and one of several ADR organizations that administer arbitration proceedings. Additionally, USADR offers mediation to parties who have filed for arbitration through USADR's national forum. USADR emphasizes accessibility in resolving disputes by embracing and promoting the traditional values of arbitration: affordability, expediency, and equity; favoring the use of industry experts and promoting fairness and fair process to pro se parties and represented parties alike. Its corporate headquarters is located in Denver, Colorado.

Contents

History

USADR, Inc. was founded in 2005, offering to the state of Colorado an alternative dispute resolution service including arbitration and mediation services under the name Colorado Mediators & Arbitrators. The original Rules of Procedure were drafted by an attorney whose primary experience was as a NASD investigator. Many of the NASD foundational values of this self-regulatory organization were retained by USADR, including the importance and emphasis placed on the experience of the industry arbitrator. Its predecessor company, Vision Mediation Group, LLC (2003-2005), limited ADR services to mediation. In 2011, USADR expanded to provide ADR services nationally, offering arbitration to all 50 United States under the name United States Arbitration Association.

United States Arbitration Association specifically addresses the unique needs of small to mid-size arbitration claims. Historically, arbitration administration for smaller dollar claims has been cost-prohibitive, making it particularly challenging for parties who seek resolution with claims of under $75,000. The administrative costs in small and mid-size claims often exceed the amount of the claim itself.

Mandatory arbitration relief

Business and commercial contracts often include arbitration provisions. Mandatory arbitration clauses have, at times, been the target of news reports identifying their potential abuses and also the subject of proposed legislation Arbitration in the United States (section Arbitration Fairness Act). When an arbitration provision is agreed to contractually between the parties, judicial relief (filing in a court of law) is unavailable as a remedy for disputes. United States Arbitration Association provides the administrative infrastructure for small to mid-sized claims to be decided before a single arbitrator for a small standardized fee, with the delivery of a simple award. In part, this addresses the need to contain costs, as a panel of three arbitrators triples the cost of the arbitrator's hourly rate. The arbitrator is either appointed according to USADR rules, or selected in accordance with the parties' agreement. Under its rules, USADR may appoint an arbitrator in some circumstances, for example, in lower dollar claims where the parties have not specified a process for arbitrator selection.

Rules and procedures in layman's terms

The law, its writings and publications, are published to address a specific audience; that being trained attorneys and politicians. The knowledge and vocabulary necessary to understand such publications is held away from the common man, which creates a dependency, and the commensurate expense, upon the legal counselors who make their profession as attorneys and lawmakers. A primary objective of the United States Arbitration Association is to publish its rules and procedures in layman's terms that are understandable to citizens, businessmen and businesswomen; expanding accessibility to the common citizen rather than limiting the necessary terminology to students of the law. Arbitrator applicants who have industry knowledge and expertise are favored over arbitrator applicants whose experience is limited to the courts of law, and presiding arbitrators are consequently encouraged to apply common sense and equity when deciding a matter.

Governing law

Clarification related to whether federal or state law takes precedence in a given arbitration matter is addressed in the USADR Rules of Procedure, for the benefit of the parties. "Arbitration is a creature of contract. Contractual provisions may be extremely vague or very specific about governing law (federal or state), rules of procedure, arbitrator appointment process, and identifying which court of jurisdiction for enforcement. It is critical to have a structure for judicial enforcement; therefore USADR utilizes the following guidelines when parties submit their dispute for arbitration. a) Contract Silent on Governing Law: The arbitration will be conducted under Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) unless parties agree otherwise. Federal District Court has jurisdiction for arbitration conducted under FAA. The FAA is silent on the issue of punitive damages. b) Contract Names State Law: The arbitration will be conducted under the state law specified, unless parties agree otherwise. The state district court has jurisdiction for arbitration conducted under its arbitration act. Punitive damages vary according to state. c) Contract is Silent on Rules of Procedure: The arbitration will be conducted utilizing USADR’s Rules of Procedure. Where USADR's rules conflict with governing law, the governing law will prevail. d) Stated Rules of Procedure: USADR may administer an arbitration action utilizing stated rules in the arbitration clause with the agreement of the parties. The parties shall indicate their agreement on the appropriate submission agreement according to the claim amount. USADR shall appoint the arbitrator for small claims or mid-size claims or follow the arbitrator selection process identified in Rule A-9; the appointed arbitrator shall then utilize the specified rules for all subsequent matters. Where the rules of procedure conflict with governing law, the governing law will prevail."

Presentation of applicable law

The presentation of applicable law is the responsibility of the parties. An arbitrator's disregard of the law presented by the parties is cause for challenging an award in a court of competent jurisdiction.

References

United States Arbitration Association Wikipedia