Neha Patil (Editor)

Tyson and Brother v. Banton

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citations
  
273 U.S. 418 (more)

End date
  
1927

Dissent
  
Sanford

Full case name
  
Tyson & Brother v. Banton

Majority
  
Sutherland, joined by Taft, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Butler

Dissent
  
Holmes, joined by Brandeis

Dissent
  
Stone, joined by Holmes, Brandeis

Similar
  
Adkins v Children's Hospital, Munn v Illinois, Whitney v California, Pierce v Society of Sisters, Meyer v Nebraska

Tyson & Brother v. Banton (1927) 273 U.S. 418 is a US Supreme Court case, concerning the constitutionality of the State of New York imposing restrictions on the price of resold theatre tickets. It has been reversed but is notable for the dissent of Oliver Wendell Holmes.

Contents

Background

A New York state statute limited the resale price of theatre tickets to fifty cents over the initial box office price.

Opinion of the Court

The majority declared the statute was unconstitutional on grounds of the Fourteenth Amendment, but Oliver Wendell Holmes, Louis Brandeis, Harlan F. Stone, and Edward T. Sanford dissented.

References

Tyson & Brother v. Banton Wikipedia