Rahul Sharma (Editor)

Thexton v Thexton

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citation(s)
  
[2001] 1 NZLR 237

Judge(s) sitting
  
Salmon J

Ruling court
  
High Court of New Zealand

Subsequent action(s)
  
[2002] 1 NZLR 780

Date decided
  
November 8, 2000

Thexton v Thexton

Thexton v Thexton is an important case in New Zealand trust law, applying the principle that burden of establishing an intention to create a trust rests on the person alleging it.

Contents

Background

The background of the case was a family dispute over the ownership of shares in a family business. The critical question before the court was whether the son held shares in trust for his father.

Judgment

Justice Salmon ruled, applying the principle of Herdegan v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 1988 84 ALR 271; "The burden of establishing that there was an intention to create a trust is on the person who alleges that a trust was created." Salmon J also held that inferring an intention does not require technical words and may come from a persons acts;

References

Thexton v Thexton Wikipedia