Trisha Shetty (Editor)

The First Global Revolution

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Country
  
United States

Publication date
  
1991

Originally published
  
1991

Genre
  
Non-fiction

Preceded by
  
The Limits to Growth

Language
  
English

Pages
  
259 pp

Author
  
Alexander King

Publisher
  
Pantheon Books

The First Global Revolution httpsuploadwikimediaorgwikipediaen99eFir

Cover artist
  
Fearn Cutler (1991 First Edition)

Media type
  
Print (Hardback & Paperback)

Similar
  
The Limits to Growth, Mankind at the turning point, Deadly allies, The Next Million Years, The Population Bomb

Chapter 8 p3 of the first global revolution


The First Global Revolution is a book written by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, and published by Pantheon Books in 1991. The book follows up the earlier 1972 work-product from the Club of Rome titled The Limits to Growth. The tagline of "The First Global Revolution" is, A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome. The book was intended as a blueprint for the 21st century putting forward a strategy for world survival at the onset of what they called the world's first global revolution.

Contents

Contents

  • The Problematique
  • The Whirlwind of Change
  • Some Areas of Acute Concern
  • The International Mismanagement of the World Economy
  • Intimitations of Solidarity
  • The Vacuum
  • The Human Malaise
  • Conclusion: The Challenge
  • The Resolutique
  • Introduction
  • The Three Immediacies
  • Governance and the Capacity to Govern
  • Agents of the Resolutique
  • Motivations and Values
  • Learning Our Way Into a New Era
  • Overview

    The book is a blueprint for the twenty-first century at a time when the Club of Rome thought that the onset of the first global revolution was upon them. The authors saw the world coming into a global-scale societal revolution amid social, economic, technological, and cultural upheavals that started to push humanity into an unknown. The goal of the book was to outline a strategy for mobilizing the world's governments for environmental security and clean energy by purposefully converting the world from a military to a civil economy, tackling global warming and to solve the energy problem, dealing with world poverty and disparities between the northern hemisphere and the Southern Hemisphere.

    The book saw humankind at the center of the revolution centered on:

  • Global economic growth
  • New technologies
  • Governments and the ability to govern
  • Mass Media
  • Global food security
  • Water availability
  • Environment
  • Energy
  • Population growth
  • Learning systems
  • Values/Religions
  • Materials
  • The work being the product of a Think Tank, it attempted to transcend the nation-state governance paradigm of the nineteenth-century and the twentieth-century and sought a way to eliminate some of the challenges seen inherent with those older systems of global governance. As such, it explored new and sometimes controversial viewpoints.

    Criticism

    Many of the members of the Club of Rome are seen as Elites, and critics argue passages in the book looking at how to unite divided nations by motivating them to rally around a new common fabricated enemy are clear indicators the work is conspiratorial in nature. In one passage the authors conjecture about new needed enemies or rally points for global society, "either a real one or else one invented for the purpose." Critics argue that statements like the previous made the book conspiratorial. Although, this kind of viewpoint can be seen as conspiratorial in one interpretation, it can also be seen as simply a group of well-intentioned geopolitical leaders and academics like Henry Kissinger "thinking outside the box" and exploring how to prevent shortfalls in the global governance models of the nineteenth-century and the twentieth-century like balance of power. the failure of those older models are widely blamed by Henry Kissinger in his 1994 book Diplomacy with leading to the global human catastrophes of the First World War And the Second World War.

    The following passage is generally pointed-to as a smoking gun and radical in the extreme by critics:

    References

    The First Global Revolution Wikipedia