Supriya Ghosh (Editor)

The Bremen v. Zapata Off Shore Co.

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citations
  
407 U.S. 1 (more)

Dissent
  
Douglas

Concurrence
  
White

End date
  
1972

Full case name
  
The Bremen, et al. v. Zapata Off-Shore Company

Majority
  
Burger, joined by Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist

Similar
  
Burger King Corp v Rudze, Erie Railroad Co v To, World‑Wide Volkswagen Corp v, International Shoe Co v Washington, Pennoyer v Neff

The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Company, 407 U.S. 1 (1972), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered when a U.S. court should uphold the validity of a contractual forum selection clause.

The parties had entered into an agreement for a drilling rig to be towed from Louisiana to Italy, which included a clause stating that disputes would be settled by a court in England. When a storm forced the towing party to make land in Tampa, Florida, the other party sued there. After the lower courts refused to uphold the forum selection clause, the Supreme Court held that it was enforceable unless the party seeking to avoid it could meet the high burden of showing it to be unreasonable or unjust.

References

The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co. Wikipedia