The Accumulation of Capital

Structure

It is in three sections as described below:

1. The Problem of Reproduction
2. The Historical Exposition of the Problem
   1. Round I: Sismondi--Malthus vs. Say--Ricardo, MacCulloch
   2. Round II: The Controversy between Rodbertus and von Kirchmann
   3. Round III: Struve-Bulgakov-Tugan Baranovski vs. Vorontsov-Kikolayon
3. The Historical Conditions of Accumulation

Synopsis

In the polemic, she argued that capitalism needs to constantly expand into noncapitalist areas in order to access new supply sources, markets for surplus value, and reservoirs of labor. According to Luxemburg, Marx had made an error in Capital in that the proletariat could not afford to buy the commodities they produced, and therefore by his own criteria it was impossible for capitalists to make a profit in a closed-capitalist system since the demand for commodities would be too low, and therefore much of the value of commodities could not be transformed into money. Therefore, according to Luxemburg, capitalists sought to realize profits through offloading surplus commodities onto non-capitalist economies, hence the phenomenon of imperialism as capitalist states sought to dominate weaker economies. This however lead to the destruction of non-capitalist economies as they were increasingly absorbed into the capitalist system. With the destruction of non-capitalist economies however, there would be no more markets to offload surplus commodities onto, and capitalism would break down.

Reception

The Accumulation of Capital was harshly criticized by both Marxist and non-Marxist economists, on the grounds that her logic was circular in proclaiming the impossibility of realizing profits in a close-capitalist system, and that her "underconsumptionist" theory was too crude. Her conclusion that the limits of the capitalist system drive it to imperialism and war led Luxemburg to a lifetime of campaiging against militarism and colonialism.