Puneet Varma (Editor)

Strathclyde RC v Wallace

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Ruling court
  
House of Lords

Strathclyde RC v Wallace

Citation(s)
  
[1998] 1 WLR 259, [1996] IRLR 670

Strathclyde RC v Wallace [1998] 1 WLR 259 is a UK labour law case concerning indirect discrimination and equal pay.

Contents

Facts

Teachers wanted equal pay as head teachers when they had to ‘act up’ or fill in for the heads (even though they were not formally appointed). Most of the teachers who acted up were in fact men.

The Tribunal held the women did have a claim, even though none of the factors relied were discriminatory (acting up teachers also being men). The EAT overruled, and the women claimants were unsuccessful on appeal.

Judgment

The House of Lords refused the teachers' claim. Lord Browne-Wilkinson said ‘the purpose of the section 1 of the Equal Pay Act is to eliminate sex discrimination in pay not to achieve fair wages’.

References

Strathclyde RC v Wallace Wikipedia


Similar Topics