Supriya Ghosh (Editor)

Sprange v Barnard

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citation(s)
  
(1789) 2 Bro CC 585

Ruling court
  
Court of Chancery

Location
  
England, United Kingdom

Similar
  
Paul v Constance, Knight v Knight, Milroy v Lord, Vandervell v IRC, Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley

Sprange v Barnard (1789) 2 Bro CC 585 is an English trusts law case, concerning the certainty of subject matter to create a trust. It is an example of a court concluding that the words of a testament being interpreted to mean, in essence, that a gift was intended rather than a trust.

Contents

Facts

The testatrix left £300 worth of annuities to her husband ‘for his sole use; and at his death, the remaining part of what is left, that he does not want for his own wants and use to be divided between’ a number of beneficiaries.

Judgment

Sir Richard Arden, Master of the Rolls held that no trust arose, and the husband took all the property beneficially. Making a gift was the dominant intention, not to bind the husband with a trust.

References

Sprange v Barnard Wikipedia