Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Société anonyme Cimenteries CBR Cementsbedrijven NV v Commission

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citation(s)
  
(1967) Case 8/66

Ruling court
  
European Court of Justice

Location
  
European Union

Société anonyme Cimenteries CBR Cementsbedrijven NV v Commission (1967) Case 8/66 is an EU law case, concerning judicial review in the European Union.

Contents

Facts

Under (what is now) TFEU article 101, the Council adopted Regulation 17, imposing fines on cartels, with exemptions for agreements that appeared economically beneficial. A restrictive agreement had to be notified to the Commission, to decide if it was anti-competitive or exempt. Because this procedure took time, article 15(5) said undertakings had immunity from fines when the agreement was notified until the Commission’s decision. But under article 15(6) the immunity would not apply after the Commission informed undertakings of their preliminary examination. The Noordwijk Cement companies got a letter under article 15(6) saying their immunity ceased, and it brought an action to quash the decision. The Commission argued their decision was not an ‘act’ that could be quashed, and was a mere opinion.

Judgment

The Court of Justice held that the decision was an act, by removing immunity under article 15(5).

References

Société anonyme Cimenteries CBR Cementsbedrijven NV v Commission Wikipedia