Kalpana Kalpana (Editor)

Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd v River Douglas Catchment Board

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
3 June 1949

End date
  
June 3, 1949

Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd v River Douglas Catchment Board httpsuploadwikimediaorgwikipediacommonsthu

Citation(s)
  
[1949] 2 KB 500, [1949] 2 All ER 179

Court
  
Court of Appeal of England and Wales

Similar
  
Scruttons Ltd v Midland, Tulk v Moxhay, Tweddle v Atkinson, Jackson v Horizon Holidays, Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v

Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd v River Douglas Catchment Board [1949] 2 KB 500 is an English land law and English contract law case, notable for Denning LJ's views concerning privity of contract.

Contents

Facts

The River Douglas Catchment Board agreed with a number of landowners between the River Douglas and the Leeds and Liverpool Canal) to carry out some work if some contribution to the cost was given. In 1940 Mrs S, one of the covenantees, sold her land ("Low Meadows") to Smith, which incorporated Snipes Hall Farm Ltd in 1944. In Autumn 1946 the Ellen Brook burst its banks and flooded Smith and Snipes Hall Farm land. They made a claim against the Board for damages in tort and breach of contract. The question was whether not having been privy to the original agreement was a bar to any recovery.

Judgment

The Court of Appeal all held that the Board was in breach of contract, and that breach caused damage to the farm. The agreement showed the intention that the obligation would attach to the land, and it would not matter whose hands the land came into: the owner could enforce the covenant. Because the covenant ran with the land, under section 78 Law of Property Act 1925 it could be enforced by the covenantee and successors in title. Denning LJ's notable decision went as follows.

References

Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd v River Douglas Catchment Board Wikipedia