Puneet Varma (Editor)

Simanke v Liu

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Full case name
  
Simanke v Liu

Ruling court
  
High Court of New Zealand

Judge(s) sitting
  
Henry J

Simanke v Liu

Citation(s)
  
(1994) 2 NZ ConvC 191,888

Simanke v Liu (1994) 2 NZ ConvC 191,888 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding cancellation of a contract under the Contractual Remedies Act, any deposit in excess of a customary deposit, in this case 10%, is refundable to the purchaser.

Contents

Background

Simanke agreed to sell a property to Liu for $650,000, with the sales agreement stating that a deposit of $300,000 be payable within 14 days.

The contract was later cancelled, and Siminake sued for the $300,000 deposit. Liu defended the claim by saying as under the Contractual Remedies At 1979, once a contract is cancelled, no party is obliged to perform any further on a contract. Simanke argued that the Act still requires the deposit to be paid.

Held

The court ruled that in New Zealand, the customary deposit is 10%, meaning in this case, $300,000 was not in the nature of a deposit, and so was not enforceable here. Furthermore, Simanke's claim was not helped either by the fact that the sales agreement had limited the forfeiture of deposit to be only 10% anyway. Simanke's claim was dismissed.

References

Simanke v Liu Wikipedia


Similar Topics