Kalpana Kalpana (Editor)

Siebe Gorman and Co Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Ruling court
  
Siebe Gorman & Co Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd

Citation(s)
  
[1979] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 142

Similar
  
Re Spectrum Plus Ltd, Re Brumark Investme, Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd

Siebe Gorman & Co Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd [1979] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 142 is a UK insolvency law case, concerning the definition of a floating charge. It is outdated as authority, in light of the House of Lords decision in Re Spectrum Plus Ltd.

Contents

Facts

Siebe Gorman, a diving equipment company, granted a debenture in favour of Barclays (i.e. got a loan). The document said the loan was a ‘first fixed charge’ over all present and future book debts. It required Siebe Gorman to pay the proceeds of its book debts into a Barclays bank account, and forbid Siebe Gorman from putting other charges on, or assigning the book debts to anyone else. So there was a prohibition on dealing with the book debts before collection of them. Barclays also had the right to obtain absolute control by giving notice, but that right was never exercised.

Judgment

Slade J held that it was a fixed charge. The restrictions on Siebe Gorman’s power gave the bank enough control to be inconsistent with being a floating charge.

References

Siebe Gorman & Co Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd Wikipedia