Full case name Sharplin v Henderson Decided 28 June 1988 | Citation(s) [1990] 2 NZLR 134 | |
 | ||
Ruling court | ||
Sharplin v Henderson [1990] 2 NZLR 134 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the requirement under section 7(4)(b) of the Contractual Remedies Act 1970 that a breach of a contract must be "substantial" for a contract to be cancelled.
Contents
Background
Sharplin purchased a Tauranga orchard from Henderson.
After the sale, it was discovered that the real estate agent had misrepresented that 900 trees belonged to the property, representing 25% of the property.
Sharplin sued for misrepresentation.
Held
The misrepresentation was substantial, and relief was granted.
References
Sharplin v Henderson Wikipedia(Text) CC BY-SA