Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Shapiro v. McManus

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Docket nos.
  
14–990

Date decided
  
December 8, 2015

Citations
  
577 U.S. ___ (more)

Location
  
United States of America

Full case name
  
STEPHEN M. SHAPIRO, et al., petitioners v. DAVID J. MCMANUS, JR., CHAIRMAN, MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al.

Prior history
  
On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Majority
  
Scalia, joined by unanimous

Similar
  
Heffernan v City of Paterson, Evenwel v Abbott, Betterman v Montana, Bank Markazi v Peterson, Foster v Chatman

Shapiro v mcmanus oral argument november 04 2015


Shapiro v. McManus, 577 U.S. ___ (2015) was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States clarified when United States District Court judges must refer cases to three-judge panels. In a unanimous opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court ruled that federal district courts are required to refer cases to a three-judge panel when plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the apportionment of congressional districts.

References

Shapiro v. McManus Wikipedia


Similar Topics