Neha Patil (Editor)

Sew Hoy and Sons Ltd (in liq and in rec) v Coopers and Lybrand

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citation(s)
  
[1996] 1 NZLR 392

Date decided
  
December 8, 1995

Sew Hoy & Sons Ltd (in liq and in rec) v Coopers & Lybrand

Full case name
  
Sew Hoy & Sons Ltd (in liq and in rec) v Coopers & Lybrand

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of New Zealand

Judge sittings
  
Ian McKay, John Henry, Ted Thomas

Sew Hoy & Sons Ltd (in liq and in rec) v Coopers & Lybrand [1996] 1 NZLR 392 is a cited case regarding causation.

Contents

Background

Sew Hoy & Sons Ltd was placed into receivership, and the receivers later discovered that the auditors Coopers and Lybrand had missed that the stock had been overvalued in its reports.

As result, the receivers argued that the auditors not detecting this, prevented the company from taking considering options such as taking "mitigating steps", or ceasing trading.

The receivers sued the auditors.

Held

The court dismissed the claim, as the plaintiff had not established causation for the loss.

References

Sew Hoy & Sons Ltd (in liq and in rec) v Coopers & Lybrand Wikipedia