Language English Pages 195 Originally published 1895 Page count 195 Publisher John Lane | Publication date 1895 Preceded by Honors Physiography Genre Essay Country United Kingdom | |
 | ||
Original title Select Conversations with an Uncle (Now Extinct) and Two Other Reminiscences Followed by The Time Machine: An Invention Similar A Year of Prophesying, All Aboard for Ararat, Brynhild, Boon, Certain Personal Matters | ||
Select Conversations with an Uncle, published in 1895, was H.G. Wells's first literary publication in book form. It consists of reports of twelve conversations between a fictional witty uncle who has returned to London from South Africa with "a certain affluence," as well as two other conversations (one on aestheticism that takes place in a train, titled "A Misunderstood Artist," and another on physiognomy, titled "The Man with a Nose").
Contents
Themes
The principal themes of the conversations between a Wells-like character named "George" and his uncle are fashion, the inevitability of human "discomfort" due to passing social movements, the resemblance of ideals to interior decoration, the art of being photographed, the social basis of taste in art and music, the state of being engaged, the agony of having to listen to a near neighbor playing the piano, tricycles, social novels, and the effects of marriage.
Publication
Select Conversations with an Uncle was published in a limited edition by John Lane in a series called "The Mayfair Set" and in New York by Merriam. The volume was dedicated to "To my dearest and best friend, R.A.C.," which is a misprint either for R.A. Gregory, Wells's friend who later became the editor of Nature between 1919 and 1939, or for Wells's wife, Amy Catherine Robbins (better known as "Jane"); it was published the day before The Time Machine. The pieces in the book were drawn from thirty or more articles by Wells published in the Pall Mall Gazette beginning in 1893.
Reception
Wells's "uncle" character had been "very well received" in the Pall Mall Gazette, but not all reviews of the volume were favorable. The Athenaeum panned it as "a dreary and foolish assemblage of commonplace ideas expressed in stilted phraseology."