Puneet Varma (Editor)

Schultz v Wheaton Glass Co.

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
January 13, 1970

End date
  
January 13, 1970

Schultz v Wheaton Glass Co.

Full case name
  
George P. Shultz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, v. Wheaton Glass Company

Citation(s)
  
421 F.2d 259 (3rd Cir. 1970)

Judge(s) sitting
  
Abraham Lincoln Freedman, Collins Jacques Seitz, & Ruggero J. Aldisert

Ruling court
  
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Similar
  
Phillips v Martin Marietta, Frontiero v Richardson, Meritor Savings Bank v Vi, Regents of the University

Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Co., 421 F.2d 259 (3rd Cir. 1970) was a case heard before the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 1970. It is an important case in studying the impact of the Bennett Amendment on Chapter VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, helping to define the limitations of equal pay for men and women. In its rulings, the court determined that a job that is "substantially equal" in terms of what the job entails, although not necessarily in title or job description, is protected by the Equal Pay Act. An employer who hires a woman to do the same job as a man but gives the job a new title in order to offer it a lesser pay is discriminating under that act.

Background

Wheaton Glass employed men as "selector-packer-stackers" but employed women as ""selector-packers". Both performed similar work in the company's warehouse in Millville, New Jersey but the longer title paid substantially higher wages.

References

Schultz v Wheaton Glass Co. Wikipedia