Sneha Girap (Editor)

Rude Awakening (film)

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
4.4
/
10
1
Votes
Alchetron
4.4
1 Ratings
100
90
80
70
60
50
41
30
20
10
Rate This

Rate This

Music director
  
Jonathan Elias

Duration
  

Language
  
English

4.2/10
IMDb

Genre
  
Comedy

Screenplay
  
Richard LaGravenese

Country
  
United States

Rude Awakening (film) movie poster

Director
  
David Greenwalt Aaron Russo

Release date
  
August 16, 1989 (1989-08-16) (U.S.)

Writer
  
Neil Levy (story), Neil Levy (screenplay), Richard LaGravenese (screenplay)

Directors
  
Aaron Russo, David Greenwalt

Cast
  
Cheech Marin
(Hesus),
Eric Roberts
(Fred),
Julie Hagerty
(Petra),
Robert Carradine
(Sammy),
Dion Anderson
(Dr. Binibon),
Peter Boyden
(Dr. Childs)

Similar movies
  
Flashback (1990)

Tagline
  
They came back after 20 years to find nobody wants to save the world They just want to buy it.

Rude awakening trailer 1989


Rude Awakening is a 1989 comedy film directed by David Greenwalt and Aaron Russo.

Contents

Rude awakening 1989 part1


Plot

In 1969 New York City, two hippies, Fred Wook (Eric Roberts) and Jesus Monteya (Cheech Marin), flee the US to avoid arrest by the FBI and hide out in the jungles of Central America. Fred is an idealist, working on an underground newspaper with his friend Sammy (Robert Carradine), while Jesus is a stoner whose brain has been fried after being given huge amounts of LSD by researchers (the theory being that acid and appropriate visual stimulation can turn pacifist hippies into committed soldiers; Jesus proves their failure by wishing them 'peace' as he leaves the lab.) The two flee the inner-city commune they are living in, leaving behind Sammy who feels it is important that he keep writing and publishing their message, and Fred's girlfriend, artist Petra (Julie Hagerty).

Twenty years later, Fred and Jesus are still living in the jungle, when they find a dying man who has been shot by soldiers. He gives them some documents and tells them it is vital they get the papers back to the US government. The documents imply that the US is planning to invade that very country, and outraged, Fred and Jesus decide to return to the US to get the action stopped. Having been living in isolation (and by implication, stoned the entire time) for the last 20 years, Fred and Jesus return to New York City only to find the 1980s, entrenched in the yuppie ethos, to be something of a shock. Sammy and Petra have both embraced the materialistic culture, and it takes considerable persuasion from Fred and Jesus (including a memorable speech where Jesus makes numerous profound points, ending each one with 'That's all I got to say', before launching into another ramble) before they will agree to help.

Fred, Jesus, Sammy, and Petra join forces to lead a sit-in at the University of New York to protest the planned invasion, which leaves the group despondent; the student body is indifferent and the documents turn out to be a theoretical exercise and not any genuine invasion plans. However, the controversy brought up by their publication implies that Americans would welcome a war 'we can win' and so the invasion actually happens.

Fred is broken by the idea that he started a war, and gives up all hope for the world and human race in general. Fred plans to leave New York with Jesus for places unknown, while Sammy and Petra refuse to come along with them-relunctant to give up their yuppie lifestyle. Just then on the street, some college students show up and ask Fred for his help in mobilising action; they are concerned by the numerous ecological and social problems they see around them and that Fred's sit-down protest at the university inspired them. Fred realizes that despite having failed in his personal mission to prevent war, as long as there are young and idealistic people out there that share his views, there will always be hope for the world.

The film concluded with an onscreen sing-along to the song "Revolution" during the closing credits.

Critical reception

Rude Awakening received negative reviews from critics. It currently holds a 19% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 21 reviews.

Vincent Canby of The New York Times found it endearing but lightweight: "[The film] is hapless but endearing, much like its principal characters... It is not witless, but it has no clearly defined style. It wanders, more or less aimlessly, in the way of a well-meaning, naive flower child."

Roger Ebert of The Chicago Sun-Times gave the film zero out of 4 stars and expressed his dislike of it: "Rude Awakening is such a hapless movie that one is tempted to be charitable toward it, to describe it as a sincere idea gone horribly wrong, rather than as an exercise in idiocy. But kindness is the wrong policy here, I think; the perpetrators of this film should instead be encouraged to seek out entirely new directions for their next work... No one in this movie has an adequate intelligence level. The dialogue of the characters is half-witted, their actions are inexplicable, and to the degree that they possess personalities, they are boring, self-important clods."

Bless the child 8 9 movie clip a rude awakening 2000 hd


References

Rude Awakening (film) Wikipedia
Rude Awakening (film) IMDb Rude Awakening (film) themoviedb.org