Tripti Joshi (Editor)

Rene Joly

Updated on
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Covid-19
Judge sitting  Gloria Epstein
Name  Rene Joly
Role  Musical Artist

Rene Joly wwwbideetmusiquecomimagesstaticchimenejpg
Court  Ontario Superior Court of Justice
Full case name  Rene Joly v. Pelletier and others, [1999] O.J. No. 1728 [QL], 1999 CarswellOnt 1587, 1999 WL 33187845 (Carswell) (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Court File Nos. 99-CV-166273 and 99-CV-167339, May 16, 1999)
Decided  May 16, 1999 (1999-05-16)
Albums  Perles de cristal (Mono Version)
Similar People  Etienne Roda‑Gil, Sweet xx, Gerard Manset, Eric Esteve, Fabienne Thibeault

René Joly - Chimène (1969)


Joly v Pelletier is a 1999 Ontario Superior Court of Justice case that dealt with the requirements of legal standing and vexatious litigants. The plaintiff, Rene Joly, filed a lawsuit in that was dismissed by Justice Epstein as frivolous or vexatious or an abuse of the process of the Court.

Contents

Rulings

Joly's filed suit against the Canadian Government (specifically Art Eggleton), Citibank, Shoppers Drug Mart and many others. Joly even formally submitted a "well prepared, thoughtful" argument that his DNA tests, which would prove he was not human, had been falsified. Supposedly, he was cloned from debris found on Mars by NASA in the 1960s. Judge Epstein found no reason for Joly not to stand trial or to represent himself:

I made the observation that in every respect Mr. Joly properly conducted himself before the Court. He presented himself as polite, articulate, intelligent and appeared to understand completely the issues before the Court and the consequences should I grant the relief sought.

Thus, Judge Epstein proceeded with the case, and following a motion filed by the defense, dismissed the case as frivolous and vexatious, explaining:

Rule 1.03 defines plaintiff as "a person who commences an action". The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary defines person as "an individual human being". Section 29 of the Interpretation Act provides that a person includes a corporation. It follows that if the plaintiff is not a person in that he is neither a human being nor a corporation, he cannot be a plaintiff as contemplated by the Rules of Civil Procedure. The entire basis of Mr. Joly's actions is that he is a martian, not a human being. There is certainly no suggestion that he is a corporation. I conclude therefore, that Mr. Joly, on his pleading as drafted, has no status before the Court.

References

Joly v Pelletier Wikipedia


Similar Topics
Fabienne Thibeault
Hearts Divided
Matt Moore (politician)
Topics
 
B
i
Link
H2
L