| 37 & 38 Vict. c.85|| 7 August 1874|
| An Act for the better administration of the Laws respecting the regulation of Public Worship.|
Archbishop of Canterbury Archibald Campbell Tait, 20 April 1874, private member's bill
England, Channel Islands, Isle of Man
1 July 1875 (1875-07-01)
The Public Worship Regulation Act 1874 (37 & 38 Vict. c.85) was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, introduced as a Private Member's Bill by Archbishop of Canterbury Archibald Campbell Tait, to limit what he perceived as the growing ritualism of Anglo-Catholicism and the Oxford Movement within the Church of England.
Public Worship Regulation Act 1874 Wikipedia
Tait's bill was controversial. It was given government backing by Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, who called it "a bill to put down ritualism". He referred to the practices of the Oxford Movement as "a mass in masquerade." Queen Victoria was supportive of the Act's Protestant intentions. Liberal leader William Ewart Gladstone, a high church Anglican whose sympathies were for separation of church and state, felt disgusted that the liturgy was made, as he saw it, "a parliamentary football."
Before the Act, the Church of England regulated its worship practices through the Court of Arches with appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. The Act established a new court, presided over by former Divorce Court judge Lord Penzance. Many citizens were scandalised by parliamentary interference with worship and, moreover, by its proposed supervision by a secular court. The act gave bishops the discretionary power to order a stay of proceedings.
Section 8 of the Act allowed an archdeacon, church warden or three adult male parishioners of a parish to serve on the bishop a representation that in their opinion:
The bishop had the discretion to stay proceedings but, if he allowed them to proceed, the parties had the opportunity to submit to his direction with no right of appeal. The bishop was able to issue a monition, but if the parties did not agree to his jurisdiction, then the matter was to be sent for trial (section 9).
The Act provided a casus belli for the Anglo-Catholic English Church Union and the evangelical Church Association. Many clergy were brought to trial and five ultimately imprisoned for contempt of court.the Revd Sidney Faithorn Green, Rector of St John's, Miles Platting, Manchester, 1881–82
the Revd T. Pelham Dale, Rector of St Vedast Foster Lane, in the City of London, 1880
the Revd Richard William Enraght, Rector of Holy Trinity, Bordesley, West Midlands, 1880
the Revd James Bell Cox, Vicar of St Margaret's, Liverpool
the Revd Arthur Tooth, Vicar of St James's, Hatcham, 1877
Prosecutions ended when a Royal Commission in 1906 recognised the legitimacy of pluralism in worship, but the Act remained in force for 91 years until it was repealed on 1 March 1965 by the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Measure 1963.
The Act purported to extend to the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man. As these were Crown dependencies, there was a separate question as to the power of Parliament of the United Kingdom to legislate for them. It was a confused and controversial matter (see Crown dependencies: Relationship with the UK).