Top speed 174 km/h Length 6.91 m | Wingspan 11 m First flight 1936 | |
 | ||
Manufacturer | ||
Porterfield collegiate 1st flight
The Porterfield Collegiate is an American-built two-seat training and touring monoplane built by the Porterfield Aircraft Corporation of Kansas City.
Contents
- Porterfield collegiate 1st flight
- Porterfield collegiate model plane
- Design
- Development
- Production and operations
- Variants
- Specifications CP 65
- References
Porterfield collegiate model plane
Design
Developed originally as the Porterfield Zephyr, it is a light-weight version of the earlier Model 35 Flyabout for use a pilot trainer. Powered by a 40 hp (30 kW) Continental A-40 engine it was later re-designated the Porterfield CP-40.
Development
To improve performance the engine was replaced with a 50 hp (47 kW) Continental A50-4 engine and re-designated the CP-50 Collegiate. It is a braced high-wing monoplane with a tail skid fixed landing gear. The two bracing struts run in parallel from the bottom of the fuselage and the tailplane was fixed to the top of the rear fuselage. Due to the narrowness of the fuselage, particularly to the rear of the cabin, the type is nicknamed "Skinny Bird".
Production and operations
Total production had reached 476 when production ceased in 1942 at the start of American involvement in the Second World War. Over 100 Porterfields remained active with private pilot owners in the United States and other countries in 2001. A number of variants were produced with different engine installations, resulting in a series of model designations.
In 2014 two Collegiates were active in the Europe, G-AFZL a 1939 CP-65 in U.K and F-AYRJ (ex-G-BVWY) a 1940 CP-65 in France. Others airworthy outside the USA include examples in Canada, Mexico and Argentina. An owners club exists to support the ongoing operation of the type, of which around 40 of all varieties are active.
Variants
Specifications (CP-65)
Data from The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Aircraft (Part Work 1982-1985), 1985, Orbis Publishing, Page 2760 and Simpson, 2001, p.442.
General characteristics
Performance