7.6 /10 1 Votes
Originally published 1991 | 3.8/5 Goodreads | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Similar Mark Lane books, Assassination of John F Kennedy books, Assassination books | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Khd plausible denial full album 2016
Plausible Denial: Was the CIA Involved in the Assassination of JFK? is a 1991 book by American attorney, Mark Lane that outlines his theory that former Watergate figure E. Howard Hunt was involved with the Central Intelligence Agency in the assassination of United States President John F. Kennedy. Published by Thunder's Mouth Press, the book chronicles Lane's legal defense of Liberty Lobby, a right-wing political group that was sued for libel by Hunt after it published an article in its weekly paper, The Spotlight, linking Hunt — a former CIA operative — to the assassination.
Contents
- Khd plausible denial full album 2016
- Richard helms needed to work on his plausible denial face
- Reviews
- References
Lane's chief source for Plausible Denial was Marita Lorenz, a woman contacted by Lane during the suit who provided a deposition stating that on the day prior to the assassination she transported guns from Miami to Dallas where she met Hunt, Frank Sturgis, and Jack Ruby. In the book, Lane stated that the CIA arranged the assassination of Kennedy because Kennedy had planned to destroy the Agency. Other said by Lane to be involved in a conspiracy included George H. W. Bush and George de Mohrenschildt, who he implicated as CIA agents.
In the book, Lane also blames the media for their failure to cover the trial and their lack of credence given to Kennedy assassination theories.
Richard helms needed to work on his plausible denial face
Reviews
Kirkus Reviews said Plausible Denial was a "convincing report" that was "[w]ell-reasoned at every point" and Publishers Weekly called it "[a] highly stimulating, disturbing book, marred only by repetitiousness and excessive self-justification." Writing for the Los Angeles Times, Alex Raskin wrote: "While Lane's evidence for Hunt's complicity is quite persuasive, his theorizing becomes more suspect when he moves beyond that trial in an attempt to implicate other U.S. government officials in the crime." Raskin added: "Ultimately, many of Lane's theories...are motivated less by actual evidence than by a predisposition to believe in a nefarious Establishment."
In a review for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Bob Hoover wrote that Plausible Denial "will give little grist for conspiracy buffs to chew on." Hoover added: "Hunt's link to the [assassination of Kennedy] is not confirmed by Lane's poorly written and sanctimonious book." Patricia Holt of the San Francisco Chronicle interviewed Lane and called it "a fascinating and convincing — though uneven and often self-serving — indictment" of the CIA. Lane described Plausible Denial as his "last word" on the subject and told Holt: "I'll never write another sentence about the (JFK) assassination".