The perfective aspect (abbreviated PFV), sometimes called the aoristic aspect, is a grammatical aspect used to describe an action viewed as a simple whole—a unit without interior composition. The perfective aspect is distinguished from the imperfective aspect, which presents an event as having internal structure (such as ongoing, continuous, or habitual actions). The term perfective should be distinguished from perfect (see below).
Contents
The distinction between perfective and imperfective is more important in some languages than others. In Slavic languages, it is central to the verb system. In other languages such as German, the same form such as ich ging ("I went", "I was going") can be used perfectively or imperfectively without grammatical distinction. In other languages such as Latin the distinction between perfective and imperfective is made only in the past tense (e.g. Latin veni "I came" vs veniebam "I was coming", "I used to come"). However, perfective should not be confused with tense; perfective aspect can apply to events situated in the past, present, or future.
The perfective is often thought of as being used for events of short duration (e.g. "John killed the wasp"). However, this is not necessarily the case, and a perfective verb can equally well be used for a long-lasting event, provided that it is seen as a complete whole, e.g. Tarquinius Superbus regnavit annos quinque et viginti (Livy) "Tarquin the Proud reigned for 25 years". It simply "presents an occurrence in summary, viewed as a whole from the outside, without regard for the internal make-up of the occurrence."
The perfective is also sometimes described as referring to a "completed" action; however, it would be more accurate to say that it refers to an action or situation that is seen as a complete whole, e.g. the Russian perfective future ja ub'iu tebja "I shall kill you" refers to an event which has not yet been completed.
Although the essence of the perfective is an event seen as a whole, most languages which have a perfective use it for various similar semantic roles, such as momentary events and the onsets or completions of events, all of which are single points in time and thus have no internal structure. Other languages instead have separate momentane, inchoative, or cessative aspects for those roles, with or without a general perfective.
Equivalents in English
English has neither a simple perfective nor imperfective aspect; see imperfective and perfective for some basic English equivalents of this distinction.
When translating from a language that has these aspects, they will sometimes be given separate verbs in English. For example, in Spanish, the imperfective sabía can be translated "I knew" vs. the perfective supe "I found out", podía "I was able to" vs. pude "I succeeded", quería "I wanted to" vs. quise "I tried to", no quería "I did not want to" vs. no quise "I refused". Such distinctions are often language-specific.
Marking
Languages may mark perfective aspect with morphology, syntactic construction, lexemes/particles, or other means.
Perfective vs. perfect
The terms perfective and perfect should not be confused. A perfect tense is a grammatical form used to describe a past event with present relevance, or a present state resulting from a past situation. For example, "I have put it on the table" implies both that I put the object on the table and that it is still there; "I have been to France" conveys that this is a part of my experience as of now; and "I have lost my wallet" implies that this loss is troublesome at the present moment. A perfect tense does not necessarily have to be perfective in aspect; for example, "I have been waiting here for an hour" and "I have been going to that doctor all my life" are perfect but also imperfective in aspect. There are some languages, however, such as Modern Greek, where the perfect tense is always perfective.