Girish Mahajan (Editor)

Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc.

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
February 4, 1994

Ruling court
  
Delaware Supreme Court

End date
  
February 4, 1994

Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc.

Full case name
  
Paramount Communications, Inc., Viacom Inc., Martin S. Davis, Grace J. Fippinger, Irving R. Fischer, Benjamin L. Hooks, Franz J. Lutolf, James A. Pattson, Irwin Schloss, Samuel J. Silberman, Lawrence M. Small, and George Weissman v. QVC Network Inc. (In re Paramount Communications Inc. Shareholders' Litigation)

Citation(s)
  
637 A.2d 34 (Del. 1994)

Judge(s) sitting
  
E. Norman Veasey, Chief Justice, Andrew G. T. Moore II & Randy J. Holland, Justices

People also search for
  
Paramount Communications, Inc. v. Time Incorporated

In Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc., 637 A.2d 34 (Del. 1994), the Delaware Supreme Court clarified the type of transaction that triggers Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. duties.

Contents

Facts

This case involved a proposed merger between Viacom and Paramount Pictures; as part of the merger agreement, Paramount agreed to an array of defensive measures, including a no-shop provision, $100 million termination fee and a lock-up option on approximately 20% of Paramount’s common stock. However, QVC intervened with its own, facially more generous merger proposal, conditioned on cancellation of the defensive measures. The Paramount board refused to conduct a formal bidding process with QVC on the grounds that it would be inconsistent with its contractual obligations to Viacom.

Holding

Revlon triggers
When a corporation undertakes a transaction which will cause (a) a change in corporate control, or (b) a break-up of the corporate entity, the directors' obligation is to seek the best value reasonably available to the stockholders
Burden of proof
The "directors have the burden of proving that they were adequately informed and acted reasonably."
Key features of the enhanced scrutiny test
The courts will look into the adequacy of the directors’ decision making process, including what information they used in coming to their decision. In addition, the court will consider the reasonableness of the directors’ action in light of the circumstances then existing.

References

Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc. Wikipedia