Ometeotl ([oːmeˈteoːt͡ɬ]) ("Dual Cosmic Energy") is a name sometimes used to refer to the pair of Mexica Energies Ometecuhtli and Omecihuatl (also known as Tonacatecuhtli and Tonacacihuatl). In the philosophies of the Anawak people, this energy, the creator of all creation, is known as Ometeotl. "Ome" translates as "two" or "dual" in the native language of Nahuatl and "teotl" translates as "cosmic energy". The existence of such a concept and its significance is a matter of dispute among scholars of Mesoamerican religion.
Contents
Definition
Multiple Nahuatl sources, notably the Florentine Codex, name the highest level of heaven Ōmeyōcān or "place of duality" (Sahagún specifically terms it "in ōmeyōcān in chiucnāuhnepaniuhcān" or "the place of duality, above the nine-tiered heavens)." In the Histoyre du Mechique, Franciscan priest André Thevet translated a Nahuatl source reporting that in this layer of heaven there existed "a god named Ometecuhtli, which means two-gods, and one of them was a goddess." The Historia de los mexicanos por sus pinturas names the inhabitants of the uppermost heaven Tonacatecuhtli and Tonacacihuatl (Lord and Lady of Abundance). Sahagún concurs that these are epithets of "in ōmetēuctli in ōmecihuātl," giving as another name of ōmeyōcān "in tōnacātēuctli īchān" ("the mansion of the Lord of Abundance").
There is some evidence that these two gods were considered aspects of a single being, as when a singer in Cantares Mexicanos asks where he can go given that "ōme ihcac yehhuān Dios" ("they, God, stand double"). The Historia de los Mexicanos por sus pinturas reports of the two that "se criaron [sic] y estuvieron siempre en el treceno cielo, de cuyo principio no se supo jamás, sino de su estada y creación, que fue en el treceno cielo" (they created themselves and had always been in the thirteenth heaven; nothing was ever known of their beginning, just their dwelling and creation, which were in the thirteenth heaven).
As a result of these references, many scholars (most notably Miguel León-Portilla) interpret the rare name "ōmeteōtl" as "Dual God" or "Lord of the Duality." León-Portilla further argues that Ometeotl was the supreme creator deity of the Aztecs, and that the Aztecs envisioned this deity as a mystical entity with a dual nature akin to the European concept of the trinity. He argues that the Aztecs saw Ometeotl as a transcendental deity and that this accounts for the scarcity of documentary references to it and the absence of evidence of an actual cult to Ometeotl among the Aztecs.
Critique
Other scholars however, notably Richard Haly (1992), argue that there was no "Ōmeteōtl," "Ōmetēuctli," or "Ōmecihuātl" among the Aztecs. Instead, he claims, the names should be interpreted using the Nahuatl language root "omi" ("bone"), rather than "ōme" ("two"). Haly further contends that Omitecuhtli was another name for Tonacatecuhtli and Mictlantecuhtli, both gods related to the creation of humans from dead bones. He argues that, of the five sources used by León-Portilla to argue in favor of the existence of a single creator god among the Aztecs, none contains a clear reference to a god of duality.
First, León-Portilla cites the Franciscan friar Juan de Torquemada, who affirms in his chronicle that the "Indians wanted the divine Nature shared by two gods." In his translation of the Cantares Mexicanos León-Portilla introduces a reference to the "God of duality" where it is not explicitly found in the original text, which reads "ōme ihcac yehhuān Dios." Haly argues that León-Portilla erroneously unites "stands dual" with the Spanish loanword "Dios" ("God") to invent this dual deity. Another example given by Leon-Portilla is from the Historia Tolteca-Chichimeca: "ay ōmeteōtl ya tēyōcoyani," literally "two-god, creator of humanity." Haly, reading the interjection "ay" as part of a longer (and similarly unattested) "ayōmeteōtl," argues that this should rather be translated as "juicy maguey God" as the text talks about the imbibing of pulque. The Codex Ríos has a representation of a god labelled "hometeule" - iconographic analysis shows the deity hometeule to be identical to Tonacatecuhtli. The fifth source is the Historia de los Mexicanos por sus pinturas which Haly shows does not in fact read "ometeotl," but rather "omiteuctli, ("bone-lord") who is also called "Maquizcoatl" and is explicitly stated to be identical to Huitzilopochtli.