Full case name Ohio v. Darius Clark Date 2015 | Subsequent history None | |
 | ||
Citations 576 U.S. ___ (more)
137 Ohio St. 3d 346, 2013–Ohio–4731, 999 N. E. 2d 592 Prior history Defendant convicted; reversed, No. 96207, 2011 WL 6780456 (Ohio Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2011); reversed, 999 N.E.2d 592 (Ohio 2013); rehearing denied, 999 N.E.2d 698 (Ohio 2013); certiorari granted, 575 U.S. ___ (2015) Majority Alito, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan Concurrence Scalia, joined by Ginsburg | ||
Ohio v clark oral argument march 02 2015
Ohio v. Darius Clark, 576 U.S. ___ (2015), is United States Supreme Court case opinion that narrowed the standard set in Crawford v. Washington for determining whether hearsay statements in criminal cases are permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The United States Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Supreme Court of Ohio on June 18, 2015. The court held that the out-of-court statements were admissible because the primary purpose was not to create evidence.
Contents
Myers 2015 ohio v clark
References
Ohio v. Clark Wikipedia(Text) CC BY-SA