Supriya Ghosh (Editor)

National Provincial Bank v Charnley

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citation(s)
  
[1924] 1 KB 431

National Provincial Bank v Charnley httpsuploadwikimediaorgwikipediacommonsthu

Court
  
Court of Appeal of England and Wales

Similar
  
British India Steam Na, British Eagle Internatio, Re Brumark Investme, Aluminium Industrie Vaassen, Re Spectrum Plus Ltd

National Provincial Bank v Charnley [1924] 1 KB 431 is a UK insolvency law case, concerning the taking of a security interest over a company's assets and priority of creditors in a company winding up.

Contents

Facts

Two creditors of the Fylde Bacon Curing Co were in dispute over who could seize the company’s property. The National Provincial Bank had a contract on 16 July 1921 that said it had a lease ‘demised’ for 996 years over ‘plant used in or about the premises’ in return for a loan. Charnley, an unsecured creditor who had already got judgment, argued that this did not include some company vans, because the word ‘demise’ suggested things concerning land. The bank claimed the vans should belong to it, because its charge was first, and its charge was duly registered under the Companies Act 1908 section 93 (now CA 2006 s 860).

Judgment

The Court of Appeal held, Bankes LJ and Scrutton LJ giving the first two judgments, that the substance of the documents was that a charge was to be created, and the charge had been properly registered. Atkin LJ concurred and started his judgment with an outline of what a charge was. It being a matter of the parties’ intentions, a charge had been created.

References

National Provincial Bank v Charnley Wikipedia