Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Murray v Leisureplay plc

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Murray v Leisureplay plc

Citation(s)
  
[2005] EWCA Civ 963, [2005] IRLR 946

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of England and Wales

People also search for
  
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd

Murray v Leisureplay plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 is an English contract law case, concerning the termination of an agreement and penalty clauses.

Contents

Facts

An employment contract said ‘in the event of wrongful termination by way of liquidated damages the company shall forthwith pay to the Executive a sum equal to one year’s gross salary, pension contributions and other benefits in kind.’ Leisureplay plc claimed that the bonus should be void as a penalty clause.

In the High Court, Burnton J held it was penal because no account was taken of the Executive’s duty to mitigate his loss.

Judgment

The Court of Appeal held that the bonus was valid. Arden LJ held the clause was ‘generous’ but still liquidated damages, as it was not ‘extravagant or unconscionable’.

References

Murray v Leisureplay plc Wikipedia